Recovery opportunities, work – home interference, and well-being among managers

By Toon W. Taris, Debby G. J. Beckers, Lotus C. Verhoeven, S. Geurts, Michiel A. J. Kompier, Dimitri van der Linden. 2006

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb7061ea89fead0e3d2e7f8dc00aa02ca038f4f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Work hours and well-being: The roles of work-time control and work–family interference (2007, unknown): “However, other studies have found little evidence of detrimental effects (Beckers, van der Linden, Smulders, Kompier, van Veldhoven, & van Yperen, 2004 ; Gareis & Barnett, 2002 ; Taris, Beckers, Verhoeven, Geurts, Kompier, & van der Linden, 2006 ).”
Switching on and off … : Does smartphone use obstruct the possibility to engage in recovery activities? (2014, background): “Former research showed in a cross-sectional study among managers that work–home interference and recovery opportunities are interrelated (Taris et al., 2006).”
Work–home interference: How does it manifest itself from day to day? (2006, background): “Day-to-day incomplete recovery will eventually initiate a cumulative process that, in the long run, may seriously affect health (eg, result in prolonged fatigue, sleep deprivation, and other health problems; see, for example, Sluiter, Frings-Dresen, Van der Beek, & Meijman, 2001 ; Taris, Beckers, V”
Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. (2006, background): “Although the detrimental impact of extreme overtime work has often been demonstrated, the unfavorable impact of moderate overtime hours on health and wellbeing has not been consistently shown (41, 60).”
All day and all of the night: The relative contribution of two dimensions of workaholism to well-being in self-employed workers (2008, background): “Selfemployed workers may recover from their tasks not only after work, but also during their work, e.g., by alternating strenuous tasks with things they consider more pleasurable, or by taking a break when feeling fatigued (Taris et al., 2006).”
The positive wellbeing aspects of workaholism in cross cultural perspective (2011, background): “), because high effort expenditure does not necessarily have adverse health consequences ( Taris et al. , 2006”
Proactivity, job characteristics, and engagement: a longitudinal study (2010, methodology): “Following the suggestion by several authors ( Taris et al. , 2006”
The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. (2007, background): “Moreover, job control enables individuals to adapt their working strategies and effort expenditure to their current state (Taris et al., 2006).”
Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here? (2015, background): “…& Feldt, 2009), while the lack of recovery was associated with greater exhaustion, work–home interference, and poorer objective measures of health, which included measures of nocturnal heart rate and blood pressure (e.g., Rau, 2006; Sonnentag, Arbeus, Mahn, & Fritz, 2014; Taris et al., 2006).”