Understanding Workaholism: Data Synthesis, Theoretical Critique, and Future Design Strategies
By L. W. McMillan, M. O’driscoll, N. Marsh, Elizabeth C. Brady. 2001
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa965617902305dd60a3ba2dc3bc13ca2c70c6fd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Hans De Witte
- Toon W. Taris
- A. van den Broeck
- K. Arrington
- Jesse S. Michel
- Ståle Pallesen
- Karl L. Wuensch
In Social Psychology
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Toon W. Taris
- Hans De Witte
- A. van den Broeck
- B. Schreurs
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Evangelia Demerouti
Citations in the corpus
- Workaholism, Burnout, and Work Engagement: Three of a Kind or Three Different Kinds of Employee Well‐being? (2008, background): “This double loading of absorption might be explained by the fact that workaholism is characterised by a reluctance to disengage from work (McMillan et al., 2001) and by a compulsory indulgence in work (Porter, 1996).”
- Understanding Workaholics' Motivations: A Self-Determination Perspective (2011, background): “Although various authors have stressed the importance of workaholics’ motivation, to date little research has been conducted to advance the understanding of this phenomenon from a theoretical point of view (McMillan et al., 2001; Schaufeli, Shimazu, & Taris, 2009).”
- PERSONALITY CORRELATES OF WORKAHOLISM (2006, background): “Others (Clark et al., 1996; McMillan et al., 2001) have suggested such relationships.”
- Uncovering the relationship between workaholism and workplace destructive and constructive deviance: an exploratory study (2006, background): “, 2001 ), it should come as no surprise that opinions, observations and conclusions about workaholism are both varied and conflicting.”
- Moderators of the curvilinear relation between extent of telecommuting and job and life satisfaction: The role of performance outcome orientation and worker type (2010, background): “The personal reluctance to disengage from work among those with high drive and low enjoyment (McMillan et al., 2001) implies that such individuals prefer more intense forms of working, and are most at ease either when they are physically present at work (ostensibly for long hours), or have transform”
- All Work and No Play? A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Correlates and Outcomes of Workaholism (2016, result): “When a doctoral dissertation and a published study reported the same data, we coded the published study.2 In a few cases, a study reported the results of several primary studies (e.g., Kanai & Wakabayashi, 2004; McMillan et al., 2001).”
- Validation of a New Scale for Measuring Problematic Internet Use: Implications for Pre-employment Screening (2002, unknown): “10 One of the first steps in establishing a systematic research program on a new phenomenon is to develop, refine, and validate a measure, and then use it to explore the nature of the construct itself.”
- Workaholism, work stress, work‐life imbalance: exploring gender's role (2008, background): “Some of the previous workaholism research focused on specific populations consisting of college students and members of Workaholics Anonymous ( McMillan et al. , 2001”
- The Workaholism Analysis Questionnaire: Emphasizing Work-Life Imbalance and Addiction in the Measurement of Workaholism (2013, background): “Excessive working is derived from an addiction, including obsessive-compulsive tendencies, whereby the enhanced necessity to work impedes multiple life functions (McMillan, O’Driscoll, Michael, Marsh, & Brady, 2001).”
- All day and all of the night: The relative contribution of two dimensions of workaholism to well-being in self-employed workers (2008, background): “Second, workaholics persistently and frequently think about work when they are not working; it is a “… reluctance to disengage from work that is evidenced by the tendency to […] think about work in any circumstances” (McMillan, O'Driscoll, Marsh, & Brady, 2001 , p.”