Leader‐member exchange‐subordinate outcomes relationship: role of voice and justice

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Leveraging the employee voice: a multi-level social learning perspective of ethical leadership (2019, background): “Given constraints on survey length, we were not able to measure potentially important control variables; even though we argued for the social learning mechanism of role modeling, we did not measure other forms of psychological processes that might influence voice behavior, such as LMX (Mahsud et al.”
Leader‐member exchange and attitudinal outcomes: role of procedural justice climate (2007, background): “For instance, it is positively related to several work outcomes such as organizational commitment, satisfaction with supervision, supervisory ratings of job performance, satisfaction with work, content-specific citizenship, safety commitment and accidents, and frequency of promotions (Ang et al., 20”
Impact of Ethical Leadership and Leader–Member Exchange on Whistle Blowing: The Moderating Impact of the Moral Intensity of the Issue (2011, background): “This quality of interaction has been shown to predict subordinate outcomes like satisfaction and commitment ( Bhal and Ansari 2007; Duchon et al. 1986; Vecchio and Gobdel 1984).”
The relationship between leadership styles and organizational commitment in Malaysia: role of leader–member exchange (2010, background): “This is supported by Bhal and Ansari (2007) where LMX influences organizational commitment of subordinates.”