Public Service Motivation (PSM) and Support for Citizen Participation: A Test of Perry and Vandenabeele’s Reformulation of PSM Theory

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Work-Related Stressors and Health-Related Outcomes in Public Service (2015, background): “Only recently have scholars started to test more complex relations such as moderated effects (Coursey et al., 2012).”
Street-level bureaucrats’ turnover intention: does public service motivation matter? (2017, methodology): “Although shortened versions of Perry’s (1996) scale have been widely used in previous studies (e.g. Alonso and Lewis, 2001; Brewer and Selden, 2000; Coursey et al., 2012; Kim, 2005; Pandey et al., 2008; Wright and Pandey, 2008), several recent studies have also used multidimensional models (e.”
The Psychological Mechanisms of Public Service Motivation (2016, methodology): “Using data from Phase IV of the National Administrative Studies Project, Coursey et al. (2012) found there is a direct, positive relationship between PSM and citizen participation evaluation, while the relationship is not mediated by value congruence (operationalized as POF).”
Government Employees’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Impacts of Public Service Motivation, Organizational Identification, and Subjective OCB Norms (2017, methodology): “Although the shortened versions of Perry’s scale have been widely used in previous studies (e.g., Alonso and Lewis 2001; Coursey, Yang, and Pandey 2012; Pandey, Wright, and Moynihan 2008), it should be noted that the items used in this study originated from one component (commitment to the public…”