The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension
By Tami Katzir, Nonie K. Lesaux, Y. Kim. 2009
179 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5a9cca84e82bf87b010989d6abbca7b9c1e56ca
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- J. Naeghel
- A. Warhurst
- Marissa J. Filderman
- Amanda McClelland
- Hilde Van Keer
- Sarah P. McGeown
- Yves Rosseel
- R. Norgate
In Education
- J. Naeghel
- A. Warhurst
- Marissa J. Filderman
- Amanda McClelland
- Hilde Van Keer
- Sarah P. McGeown
- Yves Rosseel
- R. Norgate
Citations in the corpus
- A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relations Between Motivation and Reading Achievement for K–12 Students (2020, background): “Studies by Katzir et al. (2009) and Taboada et al. (2009) reported that fourth-grade students’ motivation (operationalized as self-concept and teacher report of intrinsic motivation, respectively) contributed to their reading comprehension performance.”
- The Role of Parents in Adolescents’ Reading Motivation and Activity (2009, background): “Katzir et al. 2009 67 4th gr. Self-report survey: competence, ease, attitude Family reading and writing habits correlated 0.27 with reading attitude; no sig.”
- Exploring intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation among very good and very poor readers (2012, background): “Furthermore, children's reading efficacy has been shown to predict variance in their reading comprehension after controlling for word reading and verbal abilities (Katzir, Lesaux, and Kim 2009 ).”
- The Relation between Elementary Students' Recreational and Academic Reading Motivation, Reading Frequency, Engagement, and Comprehension: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. (2012, background): “…well as autonomous and controlled reading motivation contributed independently to reading frequency, reading engagement, and reading comprehension (Chapman & Tunmer, 1995; Deci & Ryan, 2000; Durik et al., 2006; Katzir et al., 2009; Skinner et al., 1990; Taboada et al., 2009; Van Elsäcker, 2002).”