The 2002 female FTSE index and women directors

By Val Singh, Susan Vinnicombe. 2003

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f591b18a7effe128d861cbdbf5e1ac1593502cfc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. M. Huse
2. S. Nielsen
3. Aila Virtanen
4. Silke Machold
5. Stuart Farquhar
6. Diamanto Politis
7. L. Ferkins
8. D. Shilbury

In Gender Studies

1. M. Huse
2. S. Nielsen
3. Aila Virtanen
4. Fabian Homberg
5. S. Takeda

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. M. Huse
2. S. Nielsen
3. Aila Virtanen

Citations in the corpus

• Why women make better directors (2013, background): “…appointed, boards adopt new governance practices earlier (such as director training, board evaluations, director succession planning structures) (Singh and Vinnicombe, 2002), become more civilised and sensitive to other perspectives (Fondas and Sassalos, 2000), reduce ‘game playing’ (Singh,…”
• Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks (2009, background): “As a result, the number of women in top management and board positions has slowly increased over the last decade (Burke and Mattis, 2005; Daily, Certo and Dalton, 1999; Singh and Vinnicombe, 2003b, 2004).”