Why women make better directors

By C. Bart, Gregory P. McQueen. 2013

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7db04f990334daf8f0c47e587f61055b16518d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Asha N. Gipson
2. Lauren T. Catenacci
3. David J. Mendelsohn
4. W. Burke
5. Danielle L. Pfaff

Citations in the corpus

• Female audit committee members and their influence on audit fees (2018, unknown): “…capability and are more likely to challenge the conventional decision making processes because they feel significantly less constrained by the use of rules, regulations and other traditional ways that dominate the typical normative 10 reasoning of male decision-making (Bart and McQueen, 2013).”
• Women and Leadership (2017, background): “Finally, women on Boards of Directors appear to approach decisions through “complex moral reasoning” (Bart & McQueen, 2013, p. 97) and by considering multiple viewpoints, accounting for varying interests of different stakeholder groups.”