The Impact of Nationalism, Patriotism and Internationalism on Consumer Ethnocentric Tendencies
By G. Balabanis, Adamantios Diamantopoulos, Rene D. Mueller, T. Melewar. 2001
720 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Marketing, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f337617b49b1bef3855a9140ac45ee37925d3cbb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Marketing
- Adamantios Diamantopoulos
- Piyush Sharma
- G. Balabanis
- Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp
- Alain d'Astous
- Sadrudin A. Ahmed
- Ian Phau
- Yu-An Huang
In Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
- Adamantios Diamantopoulos
- G. Balabanis
- Nikoletta-Theofania Siamagka
- J. Reardon
- Irena Vida
- Alain d'Astous
- Sadrudin A. Ahmed
- Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp
Citations in the corpus
- Consumer Ethnocentrism and Attitudes Towards Foreign Beer Brands: With Evidence from Zlin Region in the Czech Republic (2012, background): “Moreover, some studies reveal that women seem to be more ethnocentric than men (Balabanis et al., 2001, Javalgi, Khare, Gross & Scherer, 2005).”
- Theoretical justification of sampling choices in international marketing research: key issues and guidelines for researchers (2003, positive): “For example, Balabanis et al. (2001) used comparable samples of Czech and Turkish urban consumers to test their model of the antecedents of”
- Development and Validation of a Cross-Nationally Stable Scale of Consumer Animosity (2011, neutral): “As done in previous studies (Batra et al. 2000; Cleveland, Laroche, and Papadopoulos 2009), we used a short version of the widely validated CETSCALE (consumer ethnocentric tendency scale) proposed by Shimp and Sharma (1987) to measure consumer ethnocentrism: “It is not right to purchase foreign prod”
- Domestic consumption: rational, affective or normative choice? (2008, background): “Korea), with products from the developing or unknown countries being rated the lowest in the perceived quality hierarchy ( Balabanis et al. , 2001”
- Antecedents, moderators and dimensions of country‐of‐origin evaluations (2008, background): “Balabanis et al. (2001) have discussed the role of ethnocentrism in global product evaluations.”
- Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: assessment and guidelines (2008, background): “(2000) Belderbos and Heijltjes (2005) Barkema and Vermeulen (1997) Balabanis et al. (2001) Faff and Marshall (2005) Dyer and Song (1997) Begley and Tan (2001) Hillman and Wan (2005) Kim and Chung (1997) Filatotchev et al.”
- The impact of national stereotypes on the country of origin effect: A conceptual framework (2008, background): “…Gurhan-Canli and Maheswaran (2000) Higher consumer involvement decreases the COO effect Consumer ethnocentrism effects Shimp and Sharma (1987) and Balabanis et al. (2001) Consumer ethnocentrism increases the COO effect on evaluations as well as purchase intentions National and country…”
- The CoO‐ELM model: A theoretical framework for the cognitive processes underlying country of origin‐effects (2009, background): “, 1998; Klein, 2002), nationalism (Verlegh, 2001), internationalism (Balabanis et al., 2001), or idealism and relativism (Swaidan et al.”
- Consumer animosity, economic hardship, and normative influence: how do they affect consumers' purchase intention? (2010, background): “(Batra et al., 2000; Balabanis et al., 2001), and specifically those with a controversial military, economic and diplomatic history (Klein et al.”
- Consumer World-Mindedness and Attitudes toward Product Positioning in Advertising: An Examination of Global versus Foreign versus Local Positioning (2011, result): “The positive effect of ethnocentrism on locally positioned advertisements and its negative association with advertisements with FCCP and GCCP are consistent with previous results related to (consumer) ethnocentrism (Balabanis et al. 2001; LeVine and Campbell 1972; Sharma, Shimp, and Shin 1995); less”
- Toward a Model of Consumer Receptivity of Foreign and Domestic Products (2003, background): “The main rationale is that globalization, in the sense of lower technical barriers to trade at the national level, in fact serves to exacerbate subnational differences and to highlight other factors that are equally if not more important for marketers (e.g., Balabanis et al. 2001).”
- Extending the construct of consumer ethnocentrism: When foreign products are preferred (2006, background): “the US, Western Europe, and Japan) – all advanced economies where consumers generally take pride in their domestic products and judge them more favorably than foreign goods ( Balabanis et al. , 2001”
- Home Country Image, Country Brand Equity and Consumers’ Product Preferences: An Empirical Study (2008, background): “Future research should therefore try to further establish the discriminant validity of the CBE scale through empirically exploring its relationship with consumer ethnocentrism (Shimp/Sharma 1987) as well as other related constructs such as patriotism (Han 1988, Kosterman/Feshbach 1989) and nationali”