Characteristics of performance appraisals and their impact on sales force satisfaction
By Charles E. Pettijohn, L. Pettijohn, M. d'Amico. 2001
107 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1a1d23125986c0b764a6d5230d0dee535eea7e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- B. Kuvaas
- P. Levy
- Shih-Yu Cheng
- Jane R. Williams
- Anders Dysvik
- I. Jawahar
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Jennifer L. Sparr
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- B. Kuvaas
- Shih-Yu Cheng
- P. Levy
- Jane R. Williams
- Rachid M. Zeffane
- Anders Dysvik
- Marylène Gagné
- Robert Buch
Citations in the corpus
- Performance appraisals and job satisfaction (2017, unknown): “…appraisal feedback, or employees’ evaluations of the perceived quality, justice, and fairness of the performance appraisal regime (Greenberg, 1986; Nathan et al. 1991; Blau, 1999; Pettijohn et al., 2001; Jawahar, 2006; Kuvaas, 2006; Lau et al., 2008; Sommer & Kulkarni, 2012: Gupta & Kumar, 2013).”
- Exploring the differential impact of job satisfaction on employee attendance and conduct (2008, result): “There has been strong support to this tendency in the more recent research (see for example Pettijohn et al. , 2001”
- The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future (2004, background): “In two different surveys of salespeople, Pettijohn and his colleagues (Pettijohn et al., 2001a, 2001b) identified participation and perceptions of fairness as integral to employees’ perceptions of job satisfaction and organizational commitment.”
- The mediating role of organizational justice on the relationship between administrative performance appraisal practices and organizational commitment (2014, background): “Finally, this study only examined three types of PA practices for administrative purposes, but other practices, such as documentation or PA interviews (Pettijohn et al. 2001; Milliman et al. 2002; Wright 2004), would also affect employee perceptions of organizational justice.”
- Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: mediating and moderating roles of work motivation (2006, background): “…is obtained from studies reporting a positive relationship between PA satisfaction and overall job satisfaction (Blau, 1999; Ellickson, 2002; Pettijohn et al., 2001a, 2001b; Roberts and Reed, 1996), since job satisfaction is positively related to performance in meta-reviews (Judge et al.,…”