The relationship between conflict and decision outcomes: Moderating effects of cognitive‐ and affect‐based trust in strategic decision‐making teams
By Satyanarayana Parayitam, Robert S. Dooley. 2007
116 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f01dd127e4eb63037bd8448f6e242c0da4a86d05
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Lindred L. Greer
- K. Leithwood
- Adrian H. Pitariu
- Alper Ertürk
- Sophia Soyoung Jeong
- M. A. Korsgaard
- Karen A. Jehn
- F. D. de Wit
In Sociology and Political Science
- Lindred L. Greer
- F. D. de Wit
- Karen A. Jehn
- K. Leithwood
- Adrian H. Pitariu
- Alper Ertürk
- Sophia Soyoung Jeong
- M. A. Korsgaard
In Strategy and Management
- K. Leithwood
- Adrian H. Pitariu
- Alper Ertürk
- Sophia Soyoung Jeong
- M. A. Korsgaard
- Karen A. Jehn
- Lindred L. Greer
- F. D. de Wit
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring predictors of organizational identification: Moderating role of trust on the associations between empowerment, organizational support, and identification (2010, background): “…of organizational variables, such as between individual–job congruence and job performance (Goris et al., 2003), conflict and decision outcomes (Parayitam & Dooley, 2007), cognitive diversity and decision outcomes (Olson, Bao, & Parayitam, 2007), satisfaction and loyalty (Musa, 2005),…”
- The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. (2012, result): “In the case of task conflict and its relationship with trust and commitment, the study by Parayitam and Dooley (2007) was identified as a positive outlier and was not included in the analyses.”
- Knowledge sharing among Malaysian academics: Influence of affective commitment and trust (2013, unknown): “Explicitly, affect-based trust permits the assessor (the one who judge) to continually interact with the counterpart (the one being judged) based on positive feelings and emotions (Parayitam and Dooley, 2007).”
- Why Teachers Trust School Leaders. (2013, background): “One study found that cognition-based trust when faced with cognitive conflict results in better understood, more detailed decisions, but that the restorative tool needed for the team post-conflict is affect-based trust (Parayitam and Dooley, 2007, p. 66).”
- A Multilevel View of Intragroup Conflict (2008, background): “…have found that under conditions of low trust, where team members are apt to question each other’s motives for dissent (Dirks & Ferrin, 2001), task conflict leads to relationship conflict (Parayitam & Dooley, 2007; Peterson & Behfar, 2003; Simons & Peterson, 2000; Tidd, McIntyre, & Friedman, 2004).”