Moral potency: Building the capacity for character-based leadership.
By S. Hannah, Bruce J. Avolio. 2010
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efbe5eb2476d0a122a88d5ae9cba663f9cf605f9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Dongkyu Kim
- Douglas R. May
- Bruce J. Avolio
- S. Hannah
- Jae Uk Chun
- Subin Youn
- Yongduk, Choi
In Information Systems and Management
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Dongkyu Kim
- S. Hannah
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Gordon Wang
- Rick D. Hackett
- Douglas R. May
- Jae Uk Chun
In Social Psychology
- S. Hannah
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Dongkyu Kim
- Douglas R. May
- Rick D. Hackett
- Gordon Wang
- Dongseop Lee
Citations in the corpus
- The moral self: A review and integration of the literature (2015, background): “Regarding moral strength, Hannah and colleagues (Hannah & Avolio, 2010; Hannah et al., 2011; Hannah, Schaubroeck, et al., 2013) found the effects of moral strength depend on leaders’ behavior.”
- Ethical Leadership and Employee Moral Voice: The Mediating Role of Moral Efficacy and the Moderating Role of Leader–Follower Value Congruence (2015, methodology): “Moral voice was measured with three items adopted from the moral courage scale developed by Hannah and Avolio (2010).”
- The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance (2017, background): “As Hannah and Avolio (2010) state: “A leaders' character is defined not only by what the leader thinks but also by his or her motivation to act” (p. 292).”
- Moral Maturation and Moral Conation: A Capacity Approach to Explaining Moral Thought and Action (2011, methodology): “Hannah and Avolio (2010) recently developed a new multidimensional measure representing the three components of moral conation, based on prior work on psychological ownership (Van Dyne & Pierce, 2004), self-efficacy (Bandura, 1997), and moral courage (Gould, 2005; Kidder, 2003).”
- Ethical Leadership and Team Ethical Voice and Citizenship Behavior in the Military: The Roles of Team Moral Efficacy and Ethical Climate (2020, methodology): “Team moral efficacy is defined as a state of shared confidence in the team’s collective ability to behave ethically (Hannah & Avolio, 2010).”
- Relationships between Authentic Leadership, Moral Courage, and Ethical and Pro-Social Behaviors (2011, unknown): “We proposed that moral courage is a fairly stable character strength (Peterson & Seligman, 2004), providing the psychological resources needed to drive courageous behaviors when faced with moral dilemmas (Hannah et al., 2010).”
- Not All Followers Socially Learn from Ethical Leaders: The Roles of Followers’ Moral Identity and Leader Identification in the Ethical Leadership Process (2019, background): “1997; moral conation/moral potency, Hannah and Avolio 2010; Hannah et al.”
- Conceptualization and Measurement of Virtuous Leadership: Doing Well by Doing Good (2016, background): “Further, leaders’ virtuous behaviors nourish and reinforce an ethical climate (Hannah and Avolio, 2010; Neubert et al., 2009) which in turn, is positively associated with ethical behavior among employees (cf. Kish-Gephart et al., 2010).”