Guiding principles for effective peer response

By Jette G. Hansen, Jun Liu. 2005

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef8fa0224862e6c078b8846aa68ed8460da38ba6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

The Effect of Peer Reviewing on Writing Apprehension and Essay Writing Ability of Prospective EFL Teachers (2012, background): “In accordance with Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), the cognitive development of individuals results from the social interaction which extends their current competence through the guidance of more experienced individuals (Hansen & Liu, 2005).”
How does student peer review influence perceptions, engagement and academic outcomes? A case study (2014, background): “While there is now a large body of literature on student perspectives of peer review (for example, Dochy, Segers, and Sluijsmans 1999; Hansen and Liu 2005; Vickerman 2009) and the potential benefits of peer review to students (Topping 1998; Paulus 1999; van den Berg, Admiraal, and Pilot 2006;…”
Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom (2010, background): “…noteworthy that although the essential role of training in peer feedback has been widely discussed in the relevant empirical studies (Berg, 1999; Hansen & Liu, 2005; Hu, 2005; Min, 2005; Rollinson, 2005; Stanley, 1992; Zhu, 1995), the teacher maintained that learning was a self-discovery…”
A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback (2010, background): “Pedagogically defined, peer review assumes that students play the role of trained peer reviewers whose task is to give a commentary on their partners’ initial drafts in either written or spoken mode during composition lessons (Hansen & Liu, 2005).”
A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it (2016, background): “During peer reviews, students assume the role of trained peer reviewers and exchange written and spoken feedback on formative drafts and prototypes (Hansen and Liu 2005).”
Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation (2014, background): “In the process, students enjoy meaningful interactions with peers and boost their negotiation and diplomacy skills (Hansen and Liu, 2005; Lundstrom and Baker, 2009).”
Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014) (2016, background): “Hansen & Liu (2005) provided concrete principles (e.g. discuss students’ prior experiences with peer feedback and group work; provide students with linguistic strategies; model the peer feedback process) to guide teachers to develop effective peer feedback tasks before, during, and after peer…”