Jon M. Pearce

Education · 2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Jon M. Pearce trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. N. Falchikov
  2. Philip Vickerman
  3. R. Ballantyne

Papers from Jon M. Pearce's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jon M. Pearce trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students
  2. The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
  3. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
  4. Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views
  5. Improving Students' Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes
  6. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement
  7. Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process
  8. Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment
  9. Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives
  10. Student revision with peer and expert reviewing

Their papers