Apples and Oranges (and Pears, Oh My!): The Search for Moderators in Meta-Analysis

By Jose M. Cortina. 2003

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee8a95cb1934c27c1ce05a4e495177ce165509bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Emotional strain and organizational citizenship behaviours: A meta-analysis and review (2007, methodology): “Taken together, when the credibility interval included zero and the Q statistic was significant, we performed subgroup analyses to examine the effects of a priori moderation effects (Cortina, 2003; Halbesleben, 2006; Hunter & Schmidt, 2004).”
Toward a Further Understanding of the Relationships Between Perceptions of Support and Work Attitudes (2008, background): “Confidence intervals indicating significantly different effect sizes associated with the two groups would suggest that job type moderates the relationships between perceptions of social support and job satisfaction (Cortina, 2003).”
The Relationship Between Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Employee Attitudes, Strain, and Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Examination (2009, methodology): “When the credibility interval included zero or Q was significant, we performed subgroup analyses to examine the moderating effects of study characteristics (Cortina, 2003).”
Organizational constraints: a meta-analysis of a major stressor (2016, methodology): “We chose to use the Q statistic over alternatives because it provides a good balance between Type I error rates and statistical power (Cortina, 2003).”
Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Case Studies (2012, methodology): “The meta-analysis yields an overall estimate of effect size with the detection and estimation of interaction effects being central to the interpretation of the meta-analytic results (Cortina, 2003).”
Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis (2006, background): “According to Cortina (2003), if s.d. is less than .05, then there is absolutely no reason to be concerned about interpretation of effect sizes.”
The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis (2014, background): “In contrast, implicit or state measures of nature connectedness were excluded in order to minimize commensurability (i.e., grouping substantially different measures together; Sharpe, 1997; Cortina, 2003).”
Revealed or Concealed? Transparency of Procedures, Decisions, and Judgment Calls in Meta-Analyses (2012, result): “After examining a variety of sources (Bobko & Roth, 2008; Cortina, 2003; Geyskens et al., 2009, Guzzo et al., 1987; Higgins & Green, 2006; Lipsey & Wilson, 2001; Rothstein & McDaniel, 1989) in addition to the works of Cooper (1982, 1984, 2009) and Wanous et al.”
Core Self-Evaluations (2012, methodology): “Taken together, when the CV included zero and the Q statistic was significant, we performed subgroup analyses to examine the moderating effects of study characteristics (e.g., publication status and CSE measure used; Cortina, 2003; Hunter & Schmidt, 2004).”
Employees’ Social Context and Change-Oriented Citizenship (2013, methodology): “When the Q statistic was significant or the CV included zero, we performed subgroup analyses to examine a priori moderation (Cortina, 2003) with z tests of the difference between the corrected correlations to determine the statistical significance of the difference in magnitude (Bing, Davison, Minor”