Organizational constraints: a meta-analysis of a major stressor

By Shani Pindek, Paul E. Spector. 2016

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9723b1fa475803ff55a1ac608b596ce8d8a5e530

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Rolf van Dick
2. Antonia J. Kaluza
3. Diana Boer
4. Claudia Buengeler
5. Paul E. Spector
6. S. Fox

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Rolf van Dick
2. Antonia J. Kaluza
3. Diana Boer
4. Claudia Buengeler
5. Paul E. Spector
6. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
7. F. Fraccaroli
8. Laurenz L. Meier

In Social Psychology

1. Rolf van Dick
2. Antonia J. Kaluza
3. Diana Boer
4. Claudia Buengeler
5. Paul E. Spector
6. F. Fraccaroli
7. Laurenz L. Meier
8. Cristian Balducci

Citations in the corpus

• Do Not Cross Me: Optimizing the Use of Cross-Sectional Designs (2019, background): “For example, Spector and Pindek (2016) content analyzed papers in the two most impactful occupational health psychology journals, finding that the single-source cross-sectional self-report study was by far the most popular (41% of articles).”
• Leadership behaviour and leader self-reported well-being: A review, integration and meta-analytic examination (2020, methodology): “…are highly correlated (e.g. DeRue et al., 2011), we used (multivariate) relative weight analyses to take these intercorrelations into account (Tonidandel & LeBreton, 2015), a common procedure in meta-analyses (e.g. DeRue et al., 2011; Nahrgang, Morgeson, & Hofmann, 2011; Pindek & Spector, 2016).”