C. Pierce

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · with Aguinis · 2001–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 23 researchers and is trusted by 26 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 62 citations into it; #8,275 of 8,741 by trust here, #3,100 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 40 citations into it; #4,030 of 12,932 by trust here, #776 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 24 citations into it
• Social Psychology — 21 citations into it; #6,113 of 15,694 by trust here, #5,937 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 14 citations into it; #440 of 3,868 by trust here, #210 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 14 citations into it; #21,447 of 23,481 by trust here, #6,840 by citations
• General Health Professions — 14 citations into it; #4,143 of 4,781 by trust here, #969 by citations
• Strategy and Management — 14 citations into it

Whom C. Pierce trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Herman Aguinis
2. R. Nickerson
3. Xiao-Hua Zhou
4. P. Lachenbruch
5. K. S. Lyness
6. Nancy A. Obuchowski
7. Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben
8. Stephen Olejnik
9. S. Webber
10. Doris B. Collins

Who trusts C. Pierce overall

1. Herman Aguinis
2. R. Norouzian
3. Jamie I. D. Campbell
4. Marc Orlitzky
5. Martin J. Shepperd
6. Timo Busch
7. Frank Bosco
8. P. Frazier
9. Gwowen Shieh
10. Valerie A. Thompson

Papers from C. Pierce's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers C. Pierce trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
2. Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
3. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
4. A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium
5. Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
6. Building Better Theory: Time and The Specification of When Things Happen
7. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (Biometrics)
8. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy. (Psychological methods)
9. Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (Technometrics)
10. A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis

Their papers

• Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review. (2005) — 1,159 citations
• Meta-Analytic Choices and Judgment Calls: Implications for Theory Building and Testing, Obtained Effect Sizes, and Scholarly Impact (2011) — 294 citations
• A Generalized Solution for Approximating the Power to Detect Effects of Categorical Moderator Variables Using Multiple Regression (2001) — 148 citations
• Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values from Multifactor ANOVA Designs (2004) — 641 citations
• Comparison of Three Meta-Analytic Procedures for Estimating Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables (2008) — 105 citations
• Scale Coarseness as a Methodological Artifact (2009) — 75 citations
• Revisiting the file drawer problem in meta‐analysis: An assessment of published and nonpublished correlation matrices. (2012) — 144 citations
• Correlational effect size benchmarks. (2015) — 711 citations
• HARKing's Threat to Organizational Research: Evidence From Primary and Meta‐Analytic Sources (2016) — 104 citations
• Meta-Analytic Review of Employee Turnover as a Predictor of Firm Performance (2013) — 619 citations