The role of within‐group agreement in understanding transformational leadership
By B. J. Feinberg, Cheri Ostroff, W. Burke. 2005
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee736a843d9987dfd952c43dd2e654664d16143f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Heike Bruch
- Michael S. Cole
- Joerg Felfe
- A. Bedeian
- Ute Zaepernick-Rothe
- S. Korek
- K. Nielsen
- Kevin Daniels
Citations in the corpus
- Transformational leadership and commitment: A multilevel analysis of group-level influences and mediating processes (2010, background): “Further, Feinberg et al. (2005) found consensus of leadership behaviour to be related to leader effectiveness.”
- Linking leader behavior and leadership consensus to team performance: Integrating direct consensus and dispersion models of group composition (2011, background): “…also recognize, to the extent a leader “creates consensus and a similarity of perceptions” among teammembers, “thedegree of consensuswithin a particular constituency of a leader can be interpreted as an additional parameter”with which to assess leader effectiveness (Feinberg et al. 2005, p. 472).”
- Leadership consensus as a cross-level contextual moderator of the emotional exhaustion–work commitment relationship☆ (2007, background): “Research has previously shown that absolute levels of leadership behavior predict an array of outcomes; however, leadership scholars have similarly suggested that an effective leader creates consensus among group members' perceptions and that consensus about leadership behavior can be considered as ”
- Does shared and differentiated transformational leadership predict followers' working conditions and well-being?☆ (2012, background): “However, wewere unable to replicate the results from Haslam et al. (2005), which found that social identification predicted individual well-being through social support.”