Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance

By Eduardo Salas, S. Fiore. 2004

491 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed81a4fabd29bab3498a02eed6398377561715b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

SEIPS 2.0: A human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients (2013, background): “…individual characteristics such as age and expertise as well as collective-level characteristics such as team cohesiveness or the similarity of knowledge among group members (for fuller treatment of key team characteristics, see, e.g., (Salas, Burke, & Cannon-Bowers, 2000; Salas & Fiore, 2004)).”
Interactive Effects of Team and Task Shared Mental Models as Related to Air Traffic Controllers' Collective Efficacy and Effectiveness (2009, background): “Successfully managing team cognitive resources is seen as a way to improve team adaptation to complex and volatile environments (Mohammed & Dumville, 2001; Salas & Fiore, 2004).”
The effects of groups' variety and disparity on groups' cognitive complexity (2007, background): “Group cognition scholars argue that teamwork processes are relevant for the development of team cognition (Rentsch & Woehr, 2004; Salas & Fiore, 2004).”
Towards an understanding of macrocognition in teams: developing and defining complex collaborative processes and products (2010, background): “2000, 2003), team cognition in general (Salas and Fiore 2004), and collaborative problem-solving in particular (Warner et al.”
Teams in extreme environments: Alterations in team development and teamwork (2017, background): “Team cognition – described as the emergent combination of team members' cognitive states (e.g., knowledge, understanding, awareness) regarding issues of the team and its task – is a driving force of team performance (Salas & Fiore, 2004).”
Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance (2011, background): “In contrast, in teams lacking shared representations coordination is often less smooth, requiring members to further explain, ask for, and clarify issues (Cannon-Bowers, Salas, & Converse, 1993; Espinosa, Lerch, & Kraut, 2004; Salas & Fiore, 2004).”
Diversity mindsets and the performance of diverse teams (2013, background): “…this issue, we propose the concept of diversity mindsets in an integration and extension of diversity theory and theory in team cognition that emphasizes the importance of members’ mental representations of the team and its task(s) (Cannon-Bowers, Salas, & Converse, 1993; Salas & Fiore, 2004).”
Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity (2016, background): “Second, team diversity research has largely neglected the possibility that diversity in team composition may result in diversity in team process and states that are defined in reference to the team (e.g., team cognition; Salas & Fiore, 2004) – what we call ‘‘emergent diversity” here.”
On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments (2008, background): “Processes such as the encoding, storage, and retrieval of information are thought to apply on the team as well as the individual level (Salas & Fiore, 2004).”