Short-Term Estimates of Growth Using Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading Fluency: Estimating Standard Error of the Slope to Construct Confidence Intervals

By Theodore J. Christ. 2006

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb66b6b5757f01e2463cbb8691ec9396038c404f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading: Standard Errors Associated With Progress Monitoring Outcomes From DIBELS, AIMSweb, and an Experimental Passage Set (2009, unknown): “Although SEE is the form of measurement error typically reported in the evaluation of an instrument, within the context of evaluating an individual student’s progress, we believe SEb to be more informative as it provides information regarding the accuracy of obtained slopes.”
Curriculum-Based Measures of Beginning Writing: Technical Features of the Slope (2011, methodology): “Given that longer measurement periods (and thus, more data points) have been found to increase the reliability of slope estimates (e.g., Christ, 2006; Hintze & Christ, 2004), we conjectured that adding data points should increase reliability.”
Connecting Cognitive Theory and Assessment: Measuring Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension (2012, background): “One issue of concern in CBM progress monitoring is the unreliability associated with growth rates generated by CBM measures (e.g., Christ, 2006; Christ & Ardoin, 2009a, 2009b; Hintz & Christ, 2004; Tolar, Barth, Francis, Fletcher, Stuebing, & Vaughn, 2012; Wayman, Wallace, Wiley, Tichá, & Espin,…”
Evaluating Curriculum-Based Measurement Slope Estimates Using Data From Triannual Universal Screenings (2008, background): “…for the standard error of CBM-R levels (Christ & Ardoin, in press; Christ & Silberglitt, 2007; Poncy et al., 2005) and progress monitoring trends (Christ, 2006), relatively little is known about the effect of measurement error when data from triannual universal screenings are used to estimate…”
Literature Synthesis on Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading (2007, background): “Compton et al. examined the use of word-ID level, slope, and a combination of level and slope as a part of a process for predicting performance of participants at the end of second grade. (They also examined different classification and data analytic approaches, which are not reviewed here.) Results”
Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development (2009, background): “Those factors have a similar influence on the quality and stability of growth estimates as derived from progress monitoring data (Christ, 2006).”
Estimates of the Standard Error of Measurement for Curriculum-Based Measures of Oral Reading Fluency (2007, background): “That is, the variability in progress monitoring data around a trend line is likely to approximate the SEM (see Christ, 2006).”