Relationships between daily affect and pro‐environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro‐environmental attitude

By M. J. Bissing-Olson, A. Iyer, Kelly S. Fielding, H. Zacher. 2013

724 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e902bc8905f3872ca86eec2291a711f9ca758de2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Effects of Green HRM Practices on Employee Workplace Green Behavior: The Role of Psychological Green Climate and Employee Green Values (2017, result): “This finding is consistent with past studies, such as Bissing-Olson et al. (2013) reporting that pro-environmental attitude moderates the effect of daily effect on proactive pro-environmental behavior.”
A Conceptual Model for Green Human Resource Management: Indicators, Differential Pathways, and Multiple Pro-Environmental Outcomes (2020, background): “the extent to which employees take initiative to engage in environmentally friendly behaviors that move beyond the realm of their required work tasks” [10] (p.”
The Influence of Green Human Resource Management on Employee Green Behavior—A Study on the Mediating Effect of Environmental Belief and Green Organizational Identity (2021, methodology): “On the contrary, TGB is an in-role behavior, which is defined as the extent to which employees complete their job tasks in an environmentally friendly manner, emphasizing the extent to which core job tasks related to the protection of the environment are completed [8].”
Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear effect of positive affect on proactive behaviors (2014, background): “Previous research on proactive behaviors has generally shown a positive linear relationship between positive affect and proactive behaviors (Bindl et al., 2012; Bissing-Olson et al, 2013; Den Hartog & Belschak, 2007; Fritz & Sonnentag, 2009).”
Overcoming the barriers to pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace: A systematic review (2018, background): “, 2014, Bissing-Olson et al., 2013, Ramus, 2001), and academics thus seem to be aware of the possibility of such links. For example, Smith and O'Sullivan (2012) mentioned that “participants described their domestic and work selves as a continuum in terms of environmental attitudes and behaviour, ref”
Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility (2019, background): “…(De Roeck et al., 2016) and signalling (Jones et al., 2014) in peoples’ responses to CSR. Finally, a growing body of research is devoted to clarifying which personal characteristics play a role in CSR (Mudrack, 2007), such as traits (Zhang and Gowan, 2012) or attitudes (Bissing-Olson et al., 2013).”