Does Female Board Representation Influence Firm Performance? The Danish Evidence

By Caspar Rose. 2007

1,200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1bef97c0c08073ea19c5c05a553259afe9ac01e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Gender Studies

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project (2015, background): “Females are able to facilitate more informed decisions and bring different perspectives to boards compared to all male boards (Daily et al. 2000; Rose 2007).”
Does Female Representation on Audit Committees Affect Audit Fees (2011, neutral): “4 Watson (2002) and Rose (2007), however, document that there is no significant link between gender diversity and firm performance.”
Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks (2009, background): “…board members and company performance (e.g. Catalyst, 2004, 2005; Daily and Dalton, 2003; Erhardt, Werbel and Schrader, 2003; Singh, Vinnicombe and Johnson, 2001); while other studies report negative or no effects (e.g. Bøhren and Strøm, 2005; Randøy, Thomsen and Oxelheim, 2006; Rose, 2007).”
Board diversity and firm performance: evidence from the U.K. SMEs (2017, background): “Moreover, Rose (2007) did not find a significant association between board gender diversity and Tobin’s Q in a sample of Danish firms.”
Gender diversity and earnings management: the case of female directors with financial background (2021, background): “2017), the appointment of female directors would facilitate more informed decisions, enhance the decision-making process, and improve communication among board members (Daily and Dalton 2003; Rose 2007; Bear et al.”
Corporate Governance Characteristics and Earnings Management: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms (2011, background): “Rose (2007) evidenced that there is no significant association between female board representation and firm performance.”
Corporate governance and credit rating in Islamic banks: Does Shariah governance matters? (2015, background): “Nerveless, other researches fail to ﬁnd any statistically signiﬁcant results (Farrell and Hersch 2005; Rose 2007).”
Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms (2016, result): “These results seem in line with Randøy et al. (2006) who argue that the regulation regarding employee representation in Denmark adds to both board size and board diversity.”
Investor reaction to women directors (2010, background): “, 2003; Wan and Ong, 2005) by examining how receptive investors are of women directors, but this study also sheds light on the generalization of results from prior studies of women directors internationally (Carter et al., 2003; Erhardt et al., 2003; Farrell and Hersch, 2005; Rose, 2007; Shrader et ”
Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance? Evidence from Spain (2015, background): “Some other researchers even find no relation between both variables (Rose 2007).”
Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey (2019, result): “Furthermore, in line with previous studies (Earle, Kucsera, & Telegdy, 2005; Rose, 2007; Setia-Atmaja, 2009), financial institutions are excluded from the dataset because of their different financial reporting standards (Jackling & Johl, 2009).”