The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning

By C. Bryson, L. Hand. 2007

551 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e11a974e23c59a3570cbeb22b02e439c96dcd852

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

From copying to learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback (2011, background): “Student engagement is acknowledged to be ‘a highly desirable goal with positive outcomes for all parties’ (Bryson and Hand 2007 , 354).”
Beyond ‘doing time’: investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback (2011, background): “…this literature focuses on lack of engagement, withdrawal and the problems of ‘dropping-out’ (e.g. Willis, 1977; Finn, 1989), alienation (Mann, 2001; Bryson & Hand, 2007; Case, 2007), exclusion from school (McCluskey, 2008) or the broader aspects of (non) participation and identification with the…”
Demystifying customer brand engagement: Exploring the loyalty nexus (2011, background): “Further, engagement objects have included schools (Norris, Pignal, & Lipps, 2003), other individuals including co-workers (Saks, 2006) and fellow students (Bryson & Hand, 2007), or more intangible objects including employees engaged with their jobs (Catteeuw, Flynn, & Vonderhorst, 2007). Addressing ”
The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review (2015, background): “This is also supported by Bryson and Hand (2007) who established that students were more likely to engage if they were supported by educators who established inviting learning environments, demanded high results, and challenged higher order thinking.”
Feedback: focusing attention on engagement (2011, background): “Within the cognitivist literature, engagement is acknowledged to be multifaceted (Bryson and Hand 2007 ; Chickering and Gamson 1987 ), and Fredericks, Blumenfeld, and Paris suggest that ‘engagement is a meta construct’ ( 2004 , 60), with all components (cognitive, emotional and behavioural) encoun”
Alienation and engagement: development of an alternative theoretical framework for understanding student learning (2008, methodology): “I have used this approach in a recent empirical study of alienation and engagement (Case, 2007) and have noted a similar study conducted in the UK ( Hand & Bryson, 2005 ).”
Literature review on the use of action research in higher education (2017, background): “…empowerment university-based academic research on action research methods or action research projects in higher achievement, but can lead to improved teaching and learning, provided both parties are engaged (Bryson and Hand 2007; Cook-Sather 2014; Jennings and Kachel 2010; Wisker et al. 2001).”
Engineering Design and Conceptual Change in Science: Addressing thermal energy and heat transfer in eighth grade (2011, background): “The active process of learning involves both mental activities and physical activities as students work with their teachers and peers and interact with the learning environment (Bryson & Hand, 2007 ; NRC, 1996 ).”
Students’ perceptions of their preparedness for transition to work after graduation (2018, background): “Bryson and Hand (2007) found when investigating student perceptions on the relationship between student engagement and learning that the level of student engagement can be measured on a line from disengaged to engaged.”
Framing student engagement in higher education (2013, background): “For example, findings highlight the critical importance of the teacher's disposition, and in particular the need for warmth and respect to foster a sense of belonging (Bryson and Hand 2007 ; Kember, Lee, and Li 2001 ).”
Seeking support: researching first‐year students’ experiences of coping with academic life (2010, background): “Yet, despite sustained institutional efforts to foster or even ‘create’ community in its broader sense, with an aim to facilitate integration and learning, there is growing evidence of student confusion, dissatisfaction and disengagement (Bryson & Hand, 2007 ; Mann, 2001 ).”