Beyond ‘doing time’: investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback
By Karen Handley, M. Price, Jill Millar. 2011
182 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/979365e51e4df69da4a719fbb70a8ad666c245e9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- F. M. Van der Kleij
- N. Winstone
- Michael J Parker
- Robert A. Nash
- James Rowntree
- Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
- David Boud
- D. Carless
Citations in the corpus
- ‘It'd be useful, but I wouldn't use it’: barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience (2017, background): “As noted earlier, for feedback to be put into action, students have to be ‘ready to engage’ (Handley et al. 2011); our data show that this implementation can be impeded by a lack of proactivity and receptiveness.”
- Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes (2017, background): “Similarly, Handley et al. (2011) theorized that learners with higher self-efficacy (i.e., a greater belief in their ability to bring about desired outcomes) might be more willing to expend effort on engaging with feedback.”
- Student perceptions of assessment feedback: a critical scoping review and call for research (2020, background): “Engagement with feedback includes students’ perception, interpretation, and the actual use of feedback (Handley et al., 2011; Hargreaves, 2011; Nicol, 2013). Handley et al. (2011), for example, distinguish between (1) ‘readiness-to-engage’ (p. 550) with 348 Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Acc”