Training Motivation in Organizations: An Analysis of Individual-Level Antecedents [*]
By Dawn S. Carlson, Dennis P. Bozeman, K. Kacmar, Patrick M. Wright, Gary C. Mcmahan. 2000
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0bdbb77a5712889cacca0a7b44fa766664f818b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. Lindsay
- Dan S. Chiaburu
- Sophia V. Marinova
- Wei‐Tao Tai
- Wei-Chi Tsai
- Denise A Jackson
- Muhammad Awais Bhatti
- A. Scaduto
Citations in the corpus
- What predicts skill transfer? An exploratory study of goal orientation, training self-efficacy and organizational supports (2005, methodology): “Training self-efficacy was measured using the nine-item scale from Noe & Wilk (1993); the scale was validated and used in other studies examining the impact of self-efficacy on training motivation (e.g. Carlson et al. , 2000).”
- Can do or will do? The importance of self-efficacy and instrumentality for training transfer (2008, methodology): “82, ‘I believe my job performance will likely improve if I use the knowledge acquired in training’), a scale validated in prior work (Carlson et al. 2000).”
- Perceived importance as a mediator of the relationship between training assignment and training motivation (2003, result): “The important role of training motivation in training effectiveness has also been confirmed by several recent empirical studies (e.g. Axtell et al., 1997; Carlson et al., 2000; Cheng, 2000; Guerrero and Sire, 2001; Tracey et al., 2001).”