Less need to be there: Cross-level effects of work practices that support work-life flexibility and enhance group processes and group-level OCB
By Linn van Dyne, E. Kossek, S. Lobel. 2007
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df0baa64ff924457fd8ff48cf6dcde374e1c759f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Fernando Jaramillo
- Jay P. Mulki
- Allan Fromen
- Timothy D. Golden
- Megan N. Shaw
- G. Hrivnak
- Tjai M. Nielsen
- James Deconinck
In Social Psychology
- Fernando Jaramillo
- Allan Fromen
- Jay P. Mulki
- Timothy D. Golden
- Megan N. Shaw
- G. Hrivnak
- Tjai M. Nielsen
In Sociology and Political Science
- Allan Fromen
- Fernando Jaramillo
- Jay P. Mulki
- Timothy D. Golden
- Megan N. Shaw
- G. Hrivnak
- Tjai M. Nielsen
- Carlo Tramontano
Citations in the corpus
- Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Performance (2009, background): “For example, a proposed crosslevel model suggests that collaborative time management, the redefinition of work contributions, proactive availability, and strategic self-presentation could all enhance group-level OCB (Van Dyne, Kossek, & Lobel, 2007).”
- Workplace isolation: salespeople and supervisors in USA (2011, background): “In addition, salespeople also welcome this arrangement for increased autonomy, reduction in unproductive commute time, and greater flexibility to satisfy demands of work and life (VanDyne, Kossek and Lobel 2007 ).”
- Does it matter where your manager works? Comparing managerial work mode (traditional, telework, virtual) across subordinate work experiences and outcomes (2011, background): “…suggestions illustrate, the matching and mismatching of work modes within the organizational unit may generate important exchange complications for both the worker and their manager, which given the growing likelihood of such occurrences (Van Dyne et al., 2007), demands significant future study.”