Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making.

By C. D. De Dreu, M. West. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001

1,250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ded9befed6cc6910c6e97e31eff4da626c07675c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanical Engineering

In Social Psychology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Agreement and Disagreement in Group Deliberation: Effects on Deliberation Satisfaction, Future Engagement, and Decision Legitimacy (2009, background): “Similarly, in small group research, conflict in group discussion increases creativity and divergent thinking (De Dreu & West, 2001), and in theory should increase the quality of the discussion by allowing the group to examine a broader range of perspectives and a richer array of assumptions (Janis,…”
Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers ☆ (2004, background): “With a few exceptions (e.g., De Dreu & West, 2001; Kameda, Ohtsubo, & Takezawa, 1997; Smith, Tindale, & Dugoni, 1996), researchers have focused on how minority dissent affects the cognitive dynamics of individual majority members rather than the social dynamics of groups containing majority and mi”
Do Workgroup Faultlines Help or Hurt? A Moderated Model of Faultlines, Team Identification, and Group Performance (2009, background): “This informationbased perspective suggests increases in the flexibility of group members' thoughts (De Dreu and West 2001, Nemeth 1986) because it facilitates effective pooling of information and integrating of alternative perspectives (Gruenfeld et al. 1996).”
The psychology of whistleblowing (2015, background): “Expressing deviant opinions can, for example, benefit group-based decision-making, increasing innovation and better overall group performance, particularly when groups can adaptively reflect upon their overall objectives [39–41].”
Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high-technology firms (2014, background): “Groups that successfully cultivate adaptability typically permit members to express themselves in wide-ranging behaviors, and this freedom of expression helps groups explore divergent solutions to a problem (De Dreu & West, 2001).”
Team creativity/innovation in culturally diverse teams: A meta‐analysis (2019, background): “High exposure to other cultures' knowledge and perspectives and the sharing and learning processes is beneficial for team creativity/innovation (Ancona & Caldwell, 1992; De Dreu & West, 2001).”
Teamwork and associated psychological factors: A review (2006, background): “De Dreu & West (2001) (Study 1) Private serviceadmin Service teams Cross-sectional/ 84% Not reported/ The Netherlands Participation (autonomy) and taking part in team-discussions are prerequisites for a significant positive association between minority dissent and team-innovation Behaviour 15. de…”
Conflict and well-being at work: The moderating role of personality (2005, background): “), it stimulates group innovation ( De Dreu and West, 2001”
Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance (2007, background): “…with participation in decision making and constructive discussion and debate around alternative approaches to team goals, tasks, and procedures (De Dreu & West, 2001; Simons, Pelled, & Smith, 1999), which can improve the amount of collective influence , involvement, and commitment relative to…”
Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation (2013, background): “Further, this definition refers to innovation as a process that encompasses creativity and implementation (De Dreu & West, 2001; George, 2007; Hülsheger, Anderson, & Salgado, 2009; Shalley, Zhou, & Oldham, 2004).”
Social capital and innovation in R&D teams: the mediating roles of psychological safety and learning from mistakes (2013, positive): “Team innovation involves introducing and applying ideas, processes, products, or procedures that are novel and useful in the team (De Dreu and West, 2001).”
Team Receptivity to Newcomers: Five Decades of Evidence and Future Research Themes (2013, background): “Within stable teams, the ideas of the members tend to converge, which limits their interest in and ability to develop and implement new ideas or work processes (De Dreu & West, 2001).”