Toward Fairness in Assessing Student Groupwork: A Protocol for Peer Evaluation of Individual Contributions

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation (2012, background): “Instructors often base a portion of students’ grades on their peer-evaluation scores or use these scores to adjust students’ team grades to reflect their team contributions (Fellenz, 2006).”
Does the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement? (2018, background): “Use of summative peer assessment may promote ‘fairness’ in marking (Fellenz 2006); reducing social loafing (Sridharan, Muttakin, and Mihret 2018); and student empowerment and development of professional and lifelong skills (Planas Lladó et al. 2014).”
The effects of gender on group work process and achievement: an analysis through self‐ and peer‐assessment (2014, background): “Other researchers also suggest that social loafing is a significant factor (Fellenz, 2006; Gammie & Matson, 2007) that affects students’ attitudes towards group work (Pfaff & Huddleston, 2003; Stark et al., 2007).”