The practitioner‐researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here?

By Neil Anderson, P. Herriot, G. Hodgkinson. 2001

426 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dae77f82ce0c1160c2b5a11d377b6d1fee30c19d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

All changes great and small: Exploring approaches to change and its leadership (2005, background): “The mode1and mode 2 debate is highlighted by Anderson et al. (2001) who developed a model of research that balances academic rigour and practical relevance (Figure 6).”
The relevance of knowledge management and intellectual capital Research (2008, background): “tioned in various business domains such as general management (Starkey andMadan, 2001), marketing (Ankers and Brennan, 2002; Varadarajan, 2003), strategy (Bailey and Ford, 1996; Gopinath and Hoffman, 1995; McGahan, 2007; Shrivastava, 1987), information systems (Anandarajan and Lippert, 2006; Baskerv”
Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future (2006, background): “Research output. The positive psychology perspective needs to produce quality research that is characterized by methodological rigor and practical relevance (i.e., pragmatic research; Anderson, Herriot, & Hodgkinson, 2001 ).”
Psychology Meets Machine Learning: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Algorithmic Job Candidate Screening (2018, background): “Furthermore, in practice, a research-practitioner gap is frequently observed in personnel selection: several methodologically sound personnel selection procedures and good-practice recommendations that are developed through research never get adopted by hiring managers (Anderson et al. 2001).”
Toward a (Pragmatic) Science of Strategic Intervention: Design Propositions for Scenario Planning (2008, background): “Anderson et al. (2001) introduced the notion of ‘Pragmatic Science’ to differentiate work that is not only highly rigorous but also highly relevant to the wider consumers of knowledge from that which is highly relevant but low in terms of rigour (Popularist Science), highly rigorous but low in…”
Evidence-based coaching: Flourishing or languishing? (2007, methodology): “In relation to the Anderson et al. (2001) framework is the area of pedantic science.”
Flexible Working and Performance: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for a Business Case (2011, positive): “Finally, 148 were selected on grounds of relevance to the research question, theoretical and methodological rigour (Anderson et al. 2001): 112 were empirically based, 17 were theoretical, 11 were literature reviews, 7 were meta-analyses and 1 was an annotated bibliography.”
Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations (2003, neutral): “Since standards of quality vary with the assumptions of each philosophical tradition (Anderson et al. 2001; Jensen and Rodgers 2001; Klein and Meyers 1999), it was decided to restrict our assessment to positivist case studies.”