Recovery from job stress: The stressor‐detachment model as an integrative framework
By Sabine Sonnentag, C. Fritz. 2015
1,208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da591f989f316876a71b2c8cc5652036a0643690
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Ulla Kinnunen *
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- S. Mauno
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Despoina Xanthopoulou
- Paraskevas Petrou
In Social Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Ulla Kinnunen *
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Despoina Xanthopoulou
- S. Mauno
- Maureen Dollard
- Wido G M Oerlemans
In Sociology and Political Science
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Ulla Kinnunen *
- S. Mauno
- Despoina Xanthopoulou
- Paraskevas Petrou
- Maureen Dollard
- Wido G M Oerlemans
- Laurenz L. Meier
Citations in the corpus
- Crafting one’s leisure time in response to high job strain (2016, background): “Via leisure activities, individuals learn new things and develop through challenges that enhance feelings of mastery and achievement (Sonnentag and Fritz, 2014).”
- Need for recovery after emotional labor: Differential effects of daily deep and surface acting (2018, background): “…with the emotional labor (Grandey, 2000; Holman, Martínez‐Iñigo, & Totterdell, 2008; Morris & Feldman, 1996) and recovery (Geurts & Sonnentag, 2006; Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015; Zijlstra, Cropley, & Rydstedt, 2014) literatures, we propose further that daily deep and surface acting have differential…”
- Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis (2018, methodology): “For example, the stressor‐detachment model (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015) describes that work demands have the potential to impair psychological detachment, and this lack of detachment is related to low well‐being.”
- Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here? (2015, methodology): “…of recovery processes in relation to the effects of work stressors on EWB have been developed based on models consistent with the JD-R and COR theories, such as the effort-recovery model (Meijman & Mulder, 1998) and the stressor-detachment model (Sonnentag, 2010; Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015).”
- How extended work availability affects well-being: The mediating roles of psychological detachment and work-family-conflict (2017, background): “Impressive empirical evidence shows that a reduction in psychological detachment can lead to decreased wellbeing effects, such as impaired mood and fatigue (e.g. Fritz, Yankelevich, Zarubin, & Barger, 2010; Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015).”
- A mindfulness intervention promoting work–life balance: How segmentation preference affects changes in detachment, well‐being, and work–life balance (2021, background): “State mindfulness can attenuate the impact of job stressors on psychological detachment (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015).”
- Work-Life Boundaries and Well-Being: Does Work-to-Life Integration Impair Well-Being through Lack of Recovery? (2018, background): “For an excellent review of the relevant literature see Sonnentag and Fritz (2014).”
- A gender perspective on work-life balance, perceived stress, and locus of control (2016, background): “For instance, Spector (1988) introduces the term work locus of control (WLOC).”
- The effect of positive work reflection during leisure time on affective well-being: Results from three diary studies (2016, background): “We also controlled for psychological detachment to examine whether positive work reflections have a positive effect on well-being that goes over and above the well-established recovery effect of psychological detachment (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2015).”