Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle
By Paul R. Carlile, Eric S. Rebentisch. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2003
577 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d89d6372392db644ca61482476e96d4172d1c0bd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- Samer Faraj
- Ann Majchrzak
- Achim Hecker
- Siobhan O’Mahony
- Davide Nicolini
- Marie Louise Mors
- Lars Håkanson
- Georgvon Krogh
In Strategy and Management
- Ann Majchrzak
- Samer Faraj
- Achim Hecker
- Elizabeth L. Lingo
- Siobhan O’Mahony
- Jacky Swan
- Davide Nicolini
- Philip H. B. More
Citations in the corpus
- Nexus Work: Brokerage on Creative Projects (2010, background): “To reconcile these disparate conceptions of brokerage, Ibarra, Kilduff, and Tsai (2005: 367) suggested that researchers examine when “the individual pursuit of network advantage detracts from or contributes to the emergence of public [collective] goods.””
- Knowledge communication and translation - a knowledge transfer model (2009, unknown): “Knowledge transfer is an area of knowledge management concerned with the movement of knowledge across the boundaries created by specialised knowledge domains (Carlile & Rebentisch, 2003).”
- Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge (2011, unknown): “Understanding the translations that happen at the boundary is an important area of current research (Carlile & Rebentisch, 2003; Carlile, 2004; Tallman & Phene, 2007).”
- Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into Performance (2012, unknown): “Yet, the meaning of ―using [resources] well‖ differs depending on a team‘s task (Steiner, 1972; Kozlowski, Gully, Nason, & Smith, 1999; Carlile & Rebentisch, 2003).”
- Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams (2012, background): “Overcoming boundaries between knowledge specialty areas requires understanding task dependencies and differences between perspectives, a process that becomes particularly complex when a team is faced with a novel situation (Carlile and Rebentisch 2003).”
- Innovation in a global consulting firm: when the problem is too much diversity (2010, background): “E-mail: lmors@london.edu context is exposure to the diverse information and practices that comes with operating across different national contexts (Bartlett and Ghoshal, 1989; Westney and Zaheer, 2008).”
- Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration (2012, background): “The idea derives from the field of science studies and it highlights the capacity of certain types of artifacts to support collaboration across diverse specialist groups by acting as “boundary objects” (Carlile 2002, 2004; Carlile and Rebentisch 2003; Levina 2005; Star and Griesemer 1989).”
- The firm as an epistemic community: The knowledge based view revisited (2010, background): “As recent research in the sociology of organizational knowledge has demonstrated, in the absence of well-defined interfaces, integration and exchange of knowledge across the boundaries of functional departments and professional expertise do not come about easily but require continual investments and”
- Knowledge Beyond the Individual? Making Sense of a Notion of Collective Knowledge in Organization Theory (2012, background): “…studied, for instance, in the interaction and exchange of members in product development teams (e.g., Bechky, 2003; D’Adderio, 2001, 2003; Carlile, 2002, 2004; Carlile & Rebentisch, 2003; Von Hippel, 1994) or the cooperation within interdisciplinary staffed project teams (e.g., Cacciatori, 2008).”
- Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries (2004, unknown): “present in the next cycle ( Carlile and Rebentisch, 2001 ).”