Impact of Structural and Psychological Empowerment on Job Strain in Nursing Work Settings: Expanding Kanter’s Model
By H. S. Spence Laschinger, J. Finegan, Judith Shamian, P. Wilk. Journal of Nursing Administration, 2001
943 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Research and Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d733307fcad7d6d30c35701dc01424f09ae1e77f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Jyotsna Bhatnagar
- Lucy L. Gilson
- Michal Biron
- M. Maynard
- H. S. Spence Laschinger
- P. Wilk
- Judith Shamian
- J. Finegan
In Research and Theory
Citations in the corpus
- Empowerment—Fad or Fab? A Multilevel Review of the Past Two Decades of Research (2012, background): “To be more precise, the literature focused on individual-level psychological empowerment includes both work that addresses the relationship between composite measures of psychological empowerment and various antecedent and outcome constructs (e.g., Laschinger et al., 2001).”
- Predictors of organizational commitment in India: strategic HR roles, organizational learning capability and psychological empowerment (2007, background): “Further, Kanter’s (1997) ‘structural’ empowerment has been found to predict job satisfaction (Laschinger et al., 2001), organizational commitment (McDermott et al.”
- A longitudinal analysis of the impact of workplace empowerment on work satisfaction (2004, methodology): “Laschinger et al. (2001b) sampled Canadian nurses in 1998.”
- Linking leadership empowerment behavior to employee attitudes and behavioral intentions: testing the mediating role of psychological empowerment (2011, background): “One of the exceptions is a study by Laschinger et al. (2001)”
- The impact of structural empowerment on individual well-being and performance: Taking agent preferences, self-efficacy and operational constraints into account (2010, background): “Over the past three decades, studies have demonstrated the largely beneficial effects of such interventions on individual performance (e.g. Chen et al., 2007; Scott and Bruce, 1994) and well-being (e.g. Chebat and Kollias, 2000; Laschinger et al., 2001).”
- Management of innovation: role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context (2012, background): “Laschinger, Finegan, Shamian and Wilk ( 2001 ) found evidence to suggest that psychological empowerment is an intervening variable between structural empowerment and employee effectiveness.”