Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?

By Wan Ng. Comput. Educ., 2012

1,440 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5a59441128e9a5573e49e8e194b4caa36697ba8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Information Systems

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A systematic review on digital literacy (2022, background): “In a structured way, the existing literature groups these skills in technological, cognitive, and social (Ng, 2012) or, more extensively, into operational, formal, information Internet, strategic, communication and content creation (van Dijk & van Deursen, 2014).”
Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world (2023, background): “The term ‘digital competencies’ refers to a set of skills that everyone needs to live, learn and work in a society where people need to communicate and access relevant information through digital technologies such as internet platforms, social media and mobile devices (Falloon, 2020; Ng et al., 2021”
Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot (2023, positive): “Six items related to DL were adopted from the study of Ng (2012), which had an acceptable level of reliability ( α = .90), which was adopted by Prior et al. (2016).”
How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? (2020, background): “Thus, although according to Ng (2012), learning new technologies is a basic skill in the technological dimension, our data suggest that a meaningful exploration of new technologies is an integral part of the pedagogical design of academic courses.”
Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? (2014, background): “It develops students’ digital literacy for creating, sharing and remixing digital resources (Hague & Payton, 2011; Mills, 2010; Ng, 2012) and in the process of doing so, students are no longer passive consumers of the technology (Resnick et al.”
Retention in Online Courses (2016, background): “Based on the results of her study, Ng (2012) inferred the need for educators to be aware of the benefits and possibilities that various technological tools provide for teachers’ training and students’ learning.”
Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines (2021, background): “This is not surprising considering a plethora of research confirming Gen Z students’ (born since 1996) high technological and digital literacy (Barrot, 2018; Ng, 2012; Roblek et al., 2019).”
Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale (2022, methodology): “The ﬁ rst measure was a popular digital literacy scale developed by Ng (2012) to measure people ’ s literacy in information and communication technology.”