Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?

By Sze Yee Lye, Joyce Hwee Ling Koh. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014

1,221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 Assessment Framework (2019, neutral): “This concept includes the ways of thinking when programming a computer as part of computer literacy (Grover and Pea 2013; Lye and Koh 2014).”
Expanding computer science education in schools: understanding teacher experiences and challenges (2016, background): “While the field of computer science is expanding in primary and secondary education, there is a critical need to train a significant number of computing teachers (Gal-Ezer & Stephenson, 2010; Lye & Koh, 2014; Ni & Guzdial, 2012).”
Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test (2017, background): “…fundamental way that an-Gonz alez), jcperez@edu. s (C. Jim enez-Fern andez). onz alez, M., et al., Which cog s in Human Behavior (2016), enables CT come alive (Lye & Koh, 2014); although CT can be transferred to various types of problems that do not directly involve programming tasks (Wing, 2008).”
Demystifying computational thinking (2017, methodology): “A review paper on integrating CT in K-12 settings by Lye and Koh (2014) was based on the Brennan and Resnick framework.”