MENTAL MODELS IN CHEMISTRY: SENIOR CHEMISTRY STUDENTS MENTAL MODELS OF CHEMICAL BONDING

By R. Coll, Neil Taylor. 2002

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d50d43210af0621f1c375d859c8bd153ed230426

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Muammer Çalık
2. Eun Jung Park
3. Gregory Light
4. Burçin Acar
5. L. Tarhan
6. Alipasa Ayas
7. Suat Ünal
8. H. Ayar-Kayali

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Burçin Acar
2. L. Tarhan
3. Eun Jung Park
4. Gregory Light
5. Suat Ünal
6. Alipasa Ayas
7. Muammer Çalık
8. R. Coll

In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

1. Muammer Çalık
2. Eun Jung Park
3. Gregory Light
4. Burçin Acar
5. L. Tarhan
6. Alipasa Ayas
7. Suat Ünal
8. R. Coll

Citations in the corpus

• Problem-Based Learning in 9th Grade Chemistry Class: ‘Intermolecular Forces’ (2008, background): “Thus, students develop a wide range of alternate conceptions ( Coll and Taylor 2002 ).”
• Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview (2007, unknown): “…language and analogies (Harrison & Treagust, 2000; Coll & Treagust, 2001a; Eshach & Garik, 2001; Nicoll, 2001), mental models (Coll & Treagust, 2001a, b, 2003; Coll & Taylor, 2002; Taber, 2002) and enhancing students’ conceptual understanding (Barker & Millar, 2000; Harrison & Treagust, 2000).”
• A review of chemical bonding studies: needs, aims, methods of exploring students’ conceptions, general knowledge claims and students’ alternative conceptions (2006, methodology): “…and analogies (Harrison & Treagust, 2000; Coll & Treagust, 2001a; Eshach & Garik, 2001; Nicoll, 2001), mental models (Coll & Treagust, 2001a, b, 2003; Coll & Taylor, 2002; Taber & Coll, 2002) and enhancing students’ conceptual understanding (Barker & Millar, 2000; Harrison & Treagust, 2000).”
• Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Understanding of Metallic Bonding (2008, methodology): “Most used is interview methodology (Garnett et al. 1990; Sanger and Greenbowe 1997; Coll and Taylor 2001, 2002 ).”
• Identifying Atomic Structure as a Threshold Concept: Student mental models and troublesomeness (2009, methodology): “As a way to explore the abstract nature and difficulty in chemistry, Coll and Taylor (2002) and Coll and Treagust (2003a) used mental model theory to analyse student perceptions of chemical bonding.”