Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment.

By Kathryn M. LaFontana, Antonius H. N. Cillessen. Developmental Psychology, 2002

629 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d45367698d6358f72d73bcf31832720701c1d3fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Christina Salmivalli
2. Ursula Kessels
3. Simona C. S. Caravita
4. E. Andreou
5. E. H. de Bruyn
6. Philip C. Rodkin
7. Allison M. Ryan
8. P. Di Blasio

In Education

1. Antonius H. N. Cillessen
2. Philip C. Rodkin
3. Sarah M. Kiefer
4. Christina Salmivalli
5. E. Andreou
6. Allison M. Ryan
7. Simona C. S. Caravita
8. Ursula Kessels

In Social Psychology

1. Christina Salmivalli
2. Antonius H. N. Cillessen
3. T. Little
4. Noel A. Card
5. Sarah M. Kiefer
6. Philip C. Rodkin
7. Simona C. S. Caravita
8. Allison M. Ryan

Citations in the corpus

• Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender (2008, background): “Another limitation of the method is that results would be stronger if nominations of unpopularity were gathered so that differentials from popularity could be calculated as is done for social preference (LaFontana & Cillessen, 2002).”
• Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment (2006, background): “, on the other hand, are viewed by peers as exhibiting dominant and aggressive tendencies in addition to prosocial ones (e.g., LaFontana & Cillessen, 1998, 2002; Lease, Kennedy, & Axelrod, 2002; Parkhurst & Hopmeyer, 1998).”
• Relations Among Gender Typicality, Peer Relations, and Mental Health During Early Adolescence (2014, background): “…five words that described a popular boy, five words that described a popular girl, five words that described a boy who gets picked on or left out, and five words that described a girl who gets picked on or left out (based on LaFontana & Cillessen, 2002; Xie, Li, Boucher, Hutchins, & Cairns, 2006).”
• Effects of Classroom Embeddedness and Density on the Social Status of Aggressive and Victimized Children (2010, background): “While aggressive youth may have both high and low social status depending on how status is measured (Cillessen & Mayeux, 2004; LaFontana & Cillessen, 2002; Parkhurst & Hopmeyer, 1998; Rodkin, Farmer, Pearl, & Van Acker, 2000), young adolescents who are victimized by their peers tend to have low…”
• The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills (2007, background): “Additionally, social preference (an aggregation of liked and disliked nominations; Coie & Dodge, 1983) appears to be negatively related to both relational and overt aggression in 4th through 8th graders (LaFontana & Cillessen, 2002).”