Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender

By Philip C. Rodkin, Christian Berger. 2008

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be5f665c602346e0042256eb663b4b88cf6b072c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Toward a Unified Science of Hierarchy: Dominance and Prestige are Two Fundamental Pathways to Human Social Rank (2014, background): “Furthermore, consistent with our account of aggression as instrumental for acquiring rank and influence (Pellegrini and Long 2002; Veenstra et al. 2007; Rodkin and Berger 2008), not only are adolescents who are most desirous of high rank more aggressive (Faris and Ennett 2012), but the display of ag”
Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship? (2016, background): “However, with regard to cyberbullying some studies have found few or no gender differences in perpetration or victimization (Slonje & Smith, 2008), while others suggest that cyberbullying is a “gendered phenomenon” (Li, 2007; Rodkin & Berger, 2008).”
Different forms of bullying and victimization: Bully-victims versus bullies and victims (2013, background): “Furthermore, dyadic studies examining “who bullies whom” (e.g., Rodkin & Berger, 2008; Sijtsema, Veenstra, Lindenberg, & Salmivalli, 2009), instead of studying “bullies”, “victims” and “bully-victims” separately, could shed light on the position of bully-victims in the bullying dyads and networks.”
Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach (2011, background): “Instead of victims’ reports, one option would be to ask all children in a classroom ‘‘who defends whom’’, like Rodkin and Berger (2008) and Sijtsema, Veenstra, Lindenberg, and Salmivalli (2009) did for bullying relationships.”
Effects of Self-Esteem and Narcissism on Bullying and Victimization During Early Adolescence (2015, background): “…2013; Fanti, Frick, & Georgiou, 2009) and bully-victims are at highest risk of a host of adjustment problems (Andreou, 2000; O’Moore & Kirkham, 2001; Rodkin & Berger, 2008; Toblin, Schwartz, Gorman, & Abou-ezzeddine, 2005), this study also investigated whether self-esteem and narcissism (both…”
Casualties of Social Combat (2014, background): “Evidence suggests that aggressors’ campaigns of harassment and abuse are rewarded with increased prestige (Junvonen et al. 2012; Kreager 2007; Rodkin and Berger 2008; Xie et al. 2002), particularly when they target socially prominent rivals (Faris 2012).”
Ecological Theory: Preventing Youth Bullying, Aggression, and Victimization (2014, background): “…is a gendered phenomenon where youth are targeted by either same- and other-sex peers in attempts to gain social status (Faris & Felmlee, 2011; Rodkin & Berger, 2008) or to marginalize lesbian, gay, bisexual, and gender-nonconforming youth (Espelage, Aragon, Birkett, & Koenig, 2008; Robinson…”