Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment

By Marlene J. Sandstrom, Antonius H. N. Cillessen. 2006

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54d9ca4f8814d9056dc0ffce3ea5eed2734373a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. B. Bradford Brown
2. Scott D. Gest
3. James D. Larson
4. H. Logis
5. Philip C. Rodkin
6. Hai-Jeong Ahn
7. Jeremy P. Bakken

In Education

1. Hai-Jeong Ahn
2. Philip C. Rodkin
3. B. Bradford Brown
4. Scott D. Gest
5. James D. Larson
6. Antonius H. N. Cillessen
7. Jeremy P. Bakken

In Social Psychology

1. Hai-Jeong Ahn
2. Philip C. Rodkin
3. Scott D. Gest
4. B. Bradford Brown
5. H. Logis
6. James D. Larson
7. Antonius H. N. Cillessen
8. T. Farmer

Citations in the corpus

• What Does It Take to Stand Up for the Victim of Bullying?: The Interplay Between Personal and Social Factors (2010, unknown): “…among peers) is linked with prosocial behavior (Lease, Kennedy, & Axelrod, 2002; Newcomb, Bukowski, & Pattee, 1993; Parkhurst & Hopmeyer, 1998; Sandstrom & Cillessen, 2006; Warden & Mackinnon, 2003; Wentzel, Filisetti, & Looney, 2007) and specifically with defending in midchildhood (Caravita…”
• Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. (2013, background): “Discussion The idea that popularity becomes salient in peer relationships when youths enter a larger peer context such as middle school or high school has been widely tested (Sandstrom & Cillessen, 2006).”
• Peer relationships in adolescence. (2009, background): “As a general rule, aggression enhances one ’ s status, but detracts from likeability (Cillessen & Borch, 2006 ; Sandstrom & Cillessen, 2006 ).”