Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability

514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Systematic Review of Mapping Strategies for the Sonification of Physical Quantities (2013, unknown): “Future developments of the classification could be validated by confrontation with the opinion of researchers from diverse fields, for example using a distributed and cooperative version of the KJ method [74] over the World Wide Web, or by using coding schemes [75].”
Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews (2013, methodology): “For example, Garrison et al. (2006) reported that coders in their study initially achieved 43 percent intercoder reliability but using the negotiated agreement method raised it to 80 percent.”
Beyond a coefficient: an interactive process for achieving inter-rater consistency in qualitative coding (2020, methodology): “Thus, our methods contribute to the ‘trustworthiness of the method’ of qualitative inquiry (Eisner, 1998; Garrison et al., 2006; Hill et al., 1997: 517; Hruschka et al., 2004; Kurasaki, 2000) by serving the same purpose as a more conventionally reached coefficient of inter-rater reliability (IRR):…”
Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions (2007, methodology): “The goal is descriptive, not predictive (Garrison et al., 2006, p. 4).”