Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews

By John L. Campbell, C. Quincy, Jordan Osserman, O. K. Pedersen. 2013

2,272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6784768ac5901c9f8e2f6040369227b5cd96cbb9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018, background): “The difference in coding behavior between coders has been discussed in the context of qualitative research (cf. Armstrong et al. 1997; Campbell et al. 2013) but rarely in the context of systematic reviews because by definition they are supposed to preclude subjectivity by having very clear-cut…”
Teachers’ Views of Students’ Mathematical Capabilities: Challenges and Possibilities for Ambitious Reform (2017, methodology): “In semistructured interviews, it is often the case that relevant ideas unfold over the course of multiple turns of talk (Campbell et al., 2013).”
Tourism and Hospitality industry resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from England (2021, methodology): “Acknowledging issues of unitization, inter-coder reliability and agreement (Campbell et al., 2013), and consistent with Denzin’s (1978) notion of ‘investigator triangulation’, themes were refined following iterative discussions between researchers, and in accordance with the main variables…”
An Informal Science Education Program’s Impact on STEM Major and STEM Career Outcomes (2020, methodology): “To assess consistency across coders (reliability), we calculated inter-coder agreement using both percent agreement (Lombard et al. 2002) and Cohen’s kappa (Cohen 1968) applying methodologies established for semi-structured interviews (Campbell et al. 2013).”
Developing Visions of High-Quality Mathematics Instruction. (2014, methodology): “As in the rubric development coding work explained previously, the VHQMI rubrics were applied to interview transcripts at the level of meaning units (Campbell et al., 2013; Graneheim & Lundman, 2004)—one or more sentences uttered by a participant to make a point about an aspect of teaching mathemati”
Beyond a coefficient: an interactive process for achieving inter-rater consistency in qualitative coding (2020, unknown): “In the calibration exercises, these team discussions sometimes led to adjustments of the codebook structure and definitions (Campbell et al., 2013), which furthered coders’ abilities to apply codes accurately to the data.”
Guidelines for Establishing Reliability When Coding Narrative Data (2015, background): “This is a decision that must be made on a case-by-case basis with attention paid to the both reliability and usefulness of the data (Campbell et al., 2013).”
Learning from Failure and Success: The Challenges for Circular Economy Implementation in SMEs in an Emerging Economy (2021, background): “The hybrid modality is preferred when there is scarce research on a subject, as in our case [50,51].”
Qualitative research in six sport and exercise psychology journals between 2010 and 2017: An updated and expanded review of trends and interpretations (2019, methodology): “A lack of agreed upon threshold for what constitutes a numerically satisfactory level of agreement among coders to achieve reliability and more or less rigour has also been noted as an issue (Campbell et al., 2013; Eakin, 2016).”
Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology (2017, background): “As Campbell et al. (2013) recognized, when discussing codes a student/assistant might defer to their”
Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research (2019, background): “Scholars in some subdisciplines of psychology, sociology, and communication may expect a formal codebook, the use of multiple coders, and formal measures of agreement using IRR [19,30,63].”
A realist approach to thematic analysis: making sense of qualitative data through experiential, inferential and dispositional themes (2021, background): “This process has the same broad goal as intercoder agreement processes that aim to reconcile through discussion the coding discrepancies between researchers (Campbell et al. 2013), although in this illustrative analysis we did not feel that it was necessary to quantify our level of agreement.”
“Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector (2019, methodology): “In order to ensure inter-coder consistency and reliability (Campbell et al., 2013) a coding standardisation exercise was undertaken, where all researchers coded one of the lengthier transcripts.”