Measuring Corporate Citizenship in Two Countries: The Case of the United States and France
By I. Maignan, O. Ferrell. 2000
677 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd70a11758efd83518de0ab3a1556d5d9a17df96
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Jean‐Pascal Gond
- Ante Glavas
- V. Swaen
- Assâad El akremi
- Ruodan Shao
- Herman Aguinis
- D. Skarlicki
- D. Rupp
In Strategy and Management
- Jean‐Pascal Gond
- V. Swaen
- Herman Aguinis
- Ante Glavas
- Assâad El akremi
- D. Rupp
- David A. Waldman
- Donald S. Siegel
Citations in the corpus
- Extending Corporate Social Responsibility Research to the Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior Domains: A Look to the Future (2013, methodology): “In the realm of CSR, this would mean that, as McWilliams and Siegel (2001) have argued, there should be a clear link between the CSR policies that are instituted by management and financial outcomes for the firm.”
- How does corporate social responsibility benefit firms? Evidence from Australia (2010, methodology): “However, the conceptualization used in this study suggests that one dimension is not necessarily more important than the others ( Maignan and Ferrell, 2000”
- The Impact of Perceived Corporate Citizenship on Organizational Cynicism, OCB, and Employee Deviance (2010, methodology): “…the law in all its functional areas while fulfilling its mission, abiding by ethical expectations such as fairness and transparency, and also engaging in discretionary acts (e.g., philanthropy) by giving back to stakeholders via volunteerism or charity (Carroll, 1998; Maignan & Ferrell, 2000).”
- When corporate social responsibility motivates employee citizenship behavior: The sensitizing role of task significance (2018, background): “…Rupp & Mallory, 2015) and the literature on measuring CSR (Chatterji, Levin, & Toffel, 2009; El Akremi, Gond, Swaen, De Roeck, & Igalens, 2015; Maignan & Ferrell, 2000; Mattingly & Berman, 2006; Turker, 2009), we created eight items that describe employees’ perceptions that their organization…”
- Under Positive Pressure (2016, methodology): “Instead, the measures in our survey rely on perceived constructs obtained from informants (Maignan & Ferrell, 2000), who should have a comprehensive view of their organization because of their specialized knowledge or position (Bagozzi & Yi, 1991).”
- Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR‐specific relative autonomy and individualism (2018, methodology): “…micro scholars as internal CSR even more closely aligns with the concepts of overall justice 12Future research should also consider using newer measures of CSR perceptions that capture a fuller range of common CSR initiatives than are captured by the Maignan and Ferrell (2000) measure used herein.”