Extending Corporate Social Responsibility Research to the Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior Domains: A Look to the Future

By F. Morgeson, Herman Aguinis, David A. Waldman, Donald S. Siegel. 2013

336 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/848439ac8d821b40aa805d48adb4a2654d92bd0d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Jean‐Pascal Gond
2. Subhash C. Kundu
3. Neha Gahlawat
4. Waris Ali
5. V. Swaen
6. Christine M. Moser
7. Assâad El akremi
8. K. De Roeck

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Jean‐Pascal Gond
2. Christine M. Moser
3. Subhash C. Kundu
4. Neha Gahlawat
5. K. De Roeck
6. V. Swaen
7. Assâad El akremi
8. Hongru Zhang

In Strategy and Management

1. Jean‐Pascal Gond
2. Christine M. Moser
3. K. De Roeck
4. Subhash C. Kundu
5. Neha Gahlawat
6. Waris Ali
7. V. Swaen
8. Assâad El akremi

Citations in the corpus

• Socially Responsible Human Resource Management and Employee Support for External CSR: Roles of Organizational CSR Climate and Perceived CSR Directed Toward Employees (2017, methodology): “Second, this research answers the call to extend CSR research into the HRM domain (Morgeson et al. 2013).”
• Effective Employee Engagement in the Workplace (2017, background): “A positive organizational culture can promote competitive work environments and continuous improvements (Morgeson et al., 2013).”
• How Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Employee Cynicism: The Mediating Role of Organizational Trust (2018, background): “2006) or employees (Morgeson et al. 2013; Aguilera et al. 2007) and shown that CSR can increase positive employee behav‐ ior through organizational commitment (Brammer et al.”
• Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility (2019, background): “…on the psychological questions of individuals’ motivations, attributes, cognitive processes, or evaluations (Gond et al., 2017; Jones and Rupp, 2018; Morgeson et al., 2013; Rupp and Mallory, 2015), others have studied individuals’ practices and processes in relation to CSR initiatives…”
• How Do Employees Perceive Corporate Responsibility? Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility Scale (2018, methodology): “In developing a scale of CSR perceptions informed by stakeholder theory while extending prior theory of CSR influence on employees, we make three contributions to the microfoundations of CSR (Aguinis & Glavas, 2012; Morgeson et al., 2013).”