Cross-National Validation of the What is Happening in this Class? (WIHIC) Questionnaire using Confirmatory Factor Analysis
By Jeffrey P. Dorman. 2003
237 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd07de01ac91d04fed84b3edd350ae749910eaaf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- B. Fraser
- Jeffrey P. Dorman
- Jill M. Aldridge
- Yan Huay Chionh
- S. Ntuli
- D. Deieso
- Avi Kaplan
- P. D. den Brok
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- B. Fraser
- Jeffrey P. Dorman
- Jill M. Aldridge
- Yan Huay Chionh
- S. Ntuli
- D. Deieso
- Philip Ogbuehi
- D. Allen
Citations in the corpus
- Parent and student perceptions of classroom learning environment and its association with student outcomes (2007, methodology): “Furthermore, in a cross-national study involving 3,980 Australian, Canadian and British students, Dorman (2003) used confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling to confirm the WIHIC’s factor structure and to demonstrate that the same factor structure applied irrespective of coun”
- Classroom environment, achievement, attitudes and self-esteem in geography and mathematics in Singapore (2009, background): “As well, in a cross-national study involving 3980 students in England, Canada and Australia (Dorman, 2003), confirmatory factor analysis supported the international validity of the WIHIC and showed that this factor structure was similar across countries, grade levels and student genders.”
- Use of multitrait-multimethod modelling to validate actual and preferred forms of the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire (2008, background): “... in studies to assess the learning environment in Indonesia (Wahyudi and Treagust 2006), Canada (Zandvliet and Fraser 2005), Australia (Dorman et al. 2006), Turkey (Telli et al. 2006), India (Koul and Fisher 2006), New Zealand (Saunders and Fisher 2006), Singapore (Khoo and Fraser 2008), the USA ”
- Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Distance Education Learning Environments in Higher Education: The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES) (2005, methodology): “This method of analysis is consistent with the intuitive-rational method of learning environment instrument development (Fraser, 1986) and has been used (Dorman, 2003) to determine if items load on a priori scales.”
- Californian science students' perceptions of their classroom learning environments (2006, methodology): “and gender ( Dorman, 2003 ), which suggests its usefulness in studying multicultural”
- Utilising learning environment assessments to improve teaching practices among in-service teachers undertaking a distance-education programme (2009, methodology): “In addition, Dorman (2003) used confirmatory factor analysis to support the seven-scale a priori factor structure and international applicability of the WIHIC among a sample of 3,980 students from Australia, Britain and Canada.”
- Physical and Psychosocial Environments Associated with Networked Classrooms (2005, methodology): “Therefore, the results in Table I support the factorial validity of the WIHIC, thus replicating considerable past research in other countries ( Dorman, 2003 ).”
- Learning environment, attitudes and conceptual development associated with innovative strategies in middle-school mathematics (2007, methodology): “The original version of WIHIC has been cross-validated in Australia, UK and Canada ( Dorman 2001, 2003 ) using a large sample of 3,980 students, Taiwan and Australia (Aldridge et al. 2000), Korea (Kim et al. 2000), Indonesia (Margianti 2002) using a sample of 2,498 university students in 50 computin”
- Positive Classroom Motivational Environments : Convergence between Mastery Goal Structure and Classroom Social Climate. (2011, background): “…& Weinstein, 1997), to evaluate effectiveness of different types of interventions (see e.g., Johnson & Johnson, 1983; Nix, Fraser, & Ledbetter, 2005; Welch & Walberg, 1972), and to compare perceived classroom climate by gender (Sinclair & Fraser, 2002) and across nations (e.g., Dorman, 2003).”
- Learning environment, attitudes and anxiety across the transition from primary to secondary school mathematics (2019, methodology): “ Dorman (2003) with 3980 secondary mathematics students in Australia, Canada and Britain”
- A Cross-National Study of Secondary Science Classroom Environments in Australia and Indonesia (2010, background): “The WIHIC has exhibited impressive validation characteristics (Dorman in press) and has achieved ‘almost bandwagon status’ according to Dorman (2003).”
- A Social Validation Assessment of Microswitch-Based Programs for Persons with Multiple Disabilities Employing Teacher Trainees and Parents as Raters (2006, unknown): “Dorman, 2003; Schalock et al., 2002; Storey, 1996).”
- Drawing from Teacher Effectiveness Research and Research into Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour to Establish a Teacher Evaluation System: A Study on the Use of Student Ratings to Evaluate Teacher Behaviour. (2005, background): “Over the past 30 years, classroom environment research has shown the quality of the classroom environment in schools to be a significant determinant of student learning (Fraser, 1994; Dorman, 2003).”
- Learning Environment, Attitudes and Achievement among Middle-school Science Students Using Inquiry-based Laboratory Activities (2008, methodology): “1997) and the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) used in the present study (Aldridge et al. 1999; Dorman 2003; Fraser and Chionh 2000; Ogbuehi and Fraser 2007).”
- Using a New Learning Environment Questionnaire for Reflection in Teacher Action Research (2012, methodology): “(WIHIC) questionnaire that has been crossvalidated across many subject areas and in numerous countries (Aldridge et al. 1999; Khoo and Fraser 2008; Dorman 2003).”
- Student Personal Perception of Classroom Climate: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (2010, methodology): “The use of instruments with supportive evidence of validity is clearly a critical feature of meaningful research (Dorman, 2003).”