Parent and student perceptions of classroom learning environment and its association with student outcomes
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7423a0c32f494ff883b95dfbbfc4b5150bae1ce2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- B. Fraser
- Jill M. Aldridge
- Jeffrey P. Dorman
- D. Deieso
- Yan Huay Chionh
- Avi Kaplan
- Allison M. Ryan
- H. Patrick
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- B. Fraser
- Jill M. Aldridge
- Jeffrey P. Dorman
- Yan Huay Chionh
- D. Deieso
- H. Patrick
- Allison M. Ryan
- Avi Kaplan
Citations in the corpus
- Learning environment, attitudes and anxiety across the transition from primary to secondary school mathematics (2019, background): “…Fraser, 2008) 543 grade 8 science students in Korea (Kim et al. 2000) 1404 students in 81 networked classes in Australia and Canada (Zandvliet and Fraser 2004)) Allen and Fraser (2007) with 520 grade 4 and 5 students and 120 parents in South Florida Koul and Fisher (2005) with 1021 secondary…”
- Positive Classroom Motivational Environments : Convergence between Mastery Goal Structure and Classroom Social Climate. (2011, methodology): “These associations have been found with the Involvement subscales of the WIHIC (e.g., “I explain my ideas to other students”; Allen & Fraser, 2007; Fraser et al., 2010; and the CES (e.g., “Students put a lot of energy into what they do here”; Trickett & Moos, 1974) and with the ICEQ’s similar…”
- Affective Teacher–Student Relationships and Students' Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Update and Test of the Mediating Role of Engagement (2017, unknown): “Effect Sizes and Sample Size (N) for Individual Studies Author Year Students (N) p/s rpe rne rpa rna rpn rea Allen & Fraser 2007 120 p .11 – .05 – – – Al–Yagon & Mikulincer 2004 205 p – – .19 −.33 −.38 – Ang 2005 266 p – – .22 −.03 −.45 – Arbeau et al. 2010 169 p .22 −.23 – – −.48 – Archambault et…”
- Classroom environment, achievement, attitudes and self-esteem in geography and mathematics in Singapore (2009, background): “Other studies have supported the validity of the WIHIC in Australia and Taiwan (Aldridge & Fraser, 2000; Aldridge et al., 1999), Korea (Kim et al., 2000), Indonesia (Margianti et al., 2004), Canada (Zandvliet & Fraser, 2004, 2005) and the USA (Allen & Fraser, 2007; Martin-Dunlop & Fraser, 2008; Ogbu”
- Utilising learning environment assessments to improve teaching practices among in-service teachers undertaking a distance-education programme (2009, unknown): “The WIHIC has been used in a range of western and non-western countries including Brunei (Riah & Fraser, 1998), Canada (Raaflaub & Fraser, 2002; Zandvliet & Fraser, 2004, 2005), Korea (Kim, Fisher & Fraser, 2000), India (Koul & Fisher, 2005), Singapore (Chionh & Fraser, in press; Khoo & Fraser, 2008”
- Use of multitrait-multimethod modelling to validate actual and preferred forms of the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire (2008, methodology): “Since its initial development, the WIHIC has been used successfully in studies to assess the learning environment in Indonesia (Wahyudi and Treagust 2006), Canada (Zandvliet and Fraser 2005), Australia (Dorman et al. 2006), Turkey (Telli et al. 2006), India (Koul and Fisher 2006), New Zealand (Saund”
- A Cross-National Study of Secondary Science Classroom Environments in Australia and Indonesia (2010, background): “These include studies in the USA (Ogbuehi and Fraser 2007; Wolf and Fraser 2008), Singapore (Chionh and Fraser 2009; Khoo and Fraser 2008), Turkey (Telli et al. 2006), Korea (Kim et al. 2000) and India (Koul and Fisher 2005).”
- Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes (2014, background): “Attempts to examine the factorial structure of student ratings in primary school appear promising, but they must be extended by applying state of the art methodological approaches (Allen & Fraser, 2007; Doll et al., 2010; see Research Question 1).”