Family Firm Performance: Further Evidence
By Jim Lee. 2006
530 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb84f69fe1d379dc15184111e10f8214cbc78a7d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Alfredo De Massis
- Pietro Mazzola
- Salvatore Sciascia
- D. Kuratko
- Torsten M. Pieper
- Matthew W. Rutherford
- Chiara Mazzi
- Daniel T. Holt
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Alfredo De Massis
- J. Pollack
- Sascha Kraus
- Pietro Mazzola
- Ernest H. O’Boyle
- Matthew W. Rutherford
- D. Kuratko
- Salvatore Sciascia
Citations in the corpus
- Family Involvement and Agency Cost Control Mechanisms in Family Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises (2015, background): “sidered to be fragmented (Huse 2000) and still in its infancy, as most of the studies focus on large, listed family firms (Lee 2006; Maury 2006; McConaughy, Matthews, and Fialko 2001).”
- Family Ownership, Board Independence, and R&D Investment (2009, background): “Moreover, family ownership may create natural alignments of interest between the firm and its staff because family members often serve as the firm’s senior managers (J. Lee, 2006).”
- Family Business Growth Around the World (2020, background): “The few studies of growth are crosssectional (Campopiano et al., 2019; Lee, 2006; McConaughy & Phillips, 1999), and have focused mainly on small- and mediumsized entrepreneurial firms (Chen et al.”
- Driving factors of innovation in family and non-family SMEs (2018, background): “2013) as well as approaches which highlight the local embeddedness of family firms (e.g., Basco 2013; Block and Spiegel 2013; Davis 1983; Lee 2006).”
- Evolutionary Psychology and Family Business: A New Synthesis for Theory, Research, and Practice (2008, result): “These findings have been echoed by Lee (2006), who looked at the same sample over a 10-year period, and in a French study (Sraer & Thesmar, 2004), which found superior performance among founder and heir-managed family firms, specifically due to their resistance to industry shocks and lower costs.”
- The role of family ownership in international entrepreneurship: exploring nonlinear effects (2012, background): “Stewardship over employees derives from the fact that paternalism is often extended from family to non-family employees, thus promoting a sense of commitment and stability (Lee 2006).”
- Determinants of women entrepreneurs' firm performance in a hostile environment (2017, methodology): “According to research, this relationship is positive (Anderson & Reeb, 2003; Lee, 2006; Mari et al., 2016; Powell & Eddleston, 2013; Prasad et al., 2013; Tlaiss, 2014), negative (Akehurst et al.”
- Family Involvement in Ownership and Management: Exploring Nonlinear Effects on Performance (2008, methodology): “Lee (2006) extended Anderson and Reeb’s study up to 2002 and used further measures of performance: He found that family-owned companies tend to experience higher employment and revenue growth over time and are more profitable.”
- Family business and financial performance: Current state of knowledge and future research challenges (2011, background): “With reference to the studies carried out on listed American companies, the percentage of family firms of the total is about 35% (Anderson & Reeb, 2003; Lee, 2006; Villalonga & Amit, 2006), except in the study by Miller et al.”
- The relationship among family business, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from the Mexican stock exchange (2012, unknown): “Others (Claessens et al., 2002; Gorton & Schmid, 1996; Himmelberg, Hubbart, & Palia, 1999; Holderness, Kroszner, & Sheehan, 1999; La Porta, López de Silanes, & Shleifer, 2002; Lee, 2006; Morck et al., 1988; Shleifer & Vishny, 1997) find evidence that family firms show a better performance than non-f”
- The emergence of bifurcation bias from unbalanced families: Examining HR practices in the family firm using circumplex theory (2018, background): “However, family firms have a reputation for exhibiting favoritism toward family members (Lee, 2006a; Lubatkin, Schulze, Ling, & Dino, 2005), which potentially manifests itself in their HR selection and pay practices (Chua, Chrisman, & Sharma, 2003; Karra, Tracey, & Phillips, 2006; Schulze,…”
- Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms' financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects (2012, background): “Along with this theoretical support, the empirical family business literature is overwhelmingly positive regarding the relation (e.g., Anderson and Reeb, 2004; Chrisman et al., 2004; Lee, 2006).”
- Advancing the Field of Family Business Research: Further Testing the Measurement Properties of the F-PEC (2010, result): “Consistent with this idea, a number of empirical works (e.g., Bennedsen, Nielsen, Perez-Gonzalez, & Wolfenzon, 2007; Lee, 2006) have used succession as the classification criterion to ensure that a given sample contains only family businesses.”