The role of family ownership in international entrepreneurship: exploring nonlinear effects
By Salvatore Sciascia, Pietro Mazzola, J. Astrachan, Torsten M. Pieper. 2012
348 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdced0a03d4c73cd7062d1eb8d42b684e98ea96a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Alfredo De Massis
- James J. Chrisman
- Federico Frattini
- J. Kotlar
- Marc van Essen
- Andrea Calabro
- P. Duran
- Liena Kano
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Alfredo De Massis
- Marc van Essen
- J. Kotlar
- Federico Frattini
- James J. Chrisman
- P. Duran
- Esra Memili
- Andrea Calabro
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Alfredo De Massis
- James J. Chrisman
- J. Kotlar
- Federico Frattini
- Marc van Essen
- Andrea Calabro
- P. Duran
- H. Fang
Citations in the corpus
- The Internationalization of Family Firms (2014, background): “It appears that in FBs, 100% family ownership has a negative impact on the internationalization (e.g., Bhaumik, Driffield, & Pal, 2010; Sciascia et al., 2012b).”
- Why is Family Firms’ Internationalization Unique? A Meta–Analysis (2017, background): “…to accept nonfamily expertise, fear of losing control of the firm, risk avoidance and conservative attitudes, and the urge to control the family’s socio-emotional wealth (SEW)1 (Fernandez & Nieto, 2006; G omez-Mej ıa, Makri, & Larraza-Kintana, 2010; Sciascia et al., 2012; Verbeke & Kano, 2012).”
- Riding the waves of family firm internationalization: A systematic literature review, integrative framework, and research agenda (2020, neutral): “Specifically, the extent of family ownership (Fernandez & Nieto, 2005, 2006; Okoroafo, 1999) and family involvement in the top-management team/board of directors (e.g. Arregle et al., 2012; Sciascia et al., 2012; D’Angelo et al., 2016) are the independent variables on which the majority of quantitat”
- Family firm internationalization: heritage assets and the impact of bifurcation bias (2018, positive): “…a more substantive reason for the lack of consensus, as suggested in a number of recent studies (Arregle et al. , 2016; Calabrò et al. , 2012; Sciascia et al. , 2012, 2013; Pukall and Calabrò, 2014) could be an omitted variable bias (Bennedsen and Foss, 2015), or, specifically, a failure to…”
- Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes, and outcomes (2018, background): “Sciascia et al. (2012) analyze the combination of family and external capital, concluding that an optimal mix exists.”
- Family Firm Heterogeneity: A Definition, Common Themes, Scholarly Progress, and Directions Forward (2021, background): “Furthermore, Sciascia et al. (2012) found an inverted U–shaped relationship between family ownership and international entrepreneurship, suggesting that moderate family ownership maximizes international entrepreneurship engagement.”
- The pursuit of international opportunities in family firms: Generational differences and the role of knowledge‐based resources (2018, result): “At the same time, our results help reconcile some mixed findings in past research (e.g., Arregle et al., 2012; Gomez-Mejia et al., 2010; Sciascia et al., 2012) by offering a more complete view of the influence of family ownership on internationalization.”
- The Influence of Ownership Structure and Board Strategic Involvement on International Sales: The Moderating Effect of Family Involvement (2013, background): “lead to the highest levels of international activities (Sciascia et al., 2012; Segaro, 2010).”
- A bibliometric analysis of family firm internationalization research: Current themes, theoretical roots, and ways forward (2020, background): “The top cited papers are Sciascia et al. (2012), Zahra (2005), and Zahra, Ireland, and Hitt (2000). The core theoretical perspective is that of STEWARDSHIP THEORY, according to”
- Family SMEs' Internationalization: Disentangling the Influence of Familiness on Spanish Firms' Export Activity** (2015, background): “From a managerial perspective, conservatism, lack of professionalism/expertise, and the inward vision of top management teams that characterize family SMEs dominated by first generations (Sciascia et al. 2012) suppose a negative influence of management and governance on the internationalization (Fer”
- Trends in family business research (2013, background): “Some of these contributions focus on small and medium enterprise, or international entrepreneurship (Sciascia et al. 2010).”