Review of Research: Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency
By Melanie R. Kuhn, P. Schwanenflugel, Elizabeth B. Meisinger. 2010
561 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c70525707eb77d5ca803ef7c124e74973e8957c6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Kristen D. Ritchey
- E. Norton
- Nell K. Duke
- R. Silverman
- Kelly B. Cartwright
- D. Speece
- Jeffrey R. Harring
- Maryanne Wolf
Citations in the corpus
- Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. (2012, background): “(Kuhn et al. 2010), so that fluency is understood as the crux of when many processes at multiple levels integrate seamlessly to promote the com-”
- Fluency Has a Role in the Simple View of Reading (2013, background): “Hudson et al. recognized prosody as an important element but noted that measurement issues hamper analysis of its role in skilled reading (see Kuhn et al., 2010, for counterarguments).”
- The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading (2021, background): “Fluency is typically seen as encompassing accuracy of word reading, automaticity of text reading, and prosody— or reading “with appropriate expression or intonation coupled with phrasing that allows for the maintenance of meaning” (Kuhn, Schwanenflugel, & Meisinger, 2010, p. 233).”