Internationalising students: reassessing diasporic and local student difference
By Christine Asmar. 2005
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Education, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3a4d2bb57f901011c02959b8543eb145937806a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Education
- Simone E. Volet
- Reneé Smit
- Mark A. C. Summers
- Ciarán Dunne
- Sanna Järvelä
- Hanna Järvenoja
- N. Didonato
- Neil Harrison
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: problematising deficit thinking (2012, background): “Asmar (2005) and Leask (2006) make arguments for the internationalisation of teaching – equipping all students to live and work in a global world with cultural diversity. All higher education institutions need to value this diversity and tap into its riches. Scott et al. (2007) point out that divers”
- Host Students' Perspectives of Intercultural Contact in an Irish University (2009, background): “This concern is echoed by Asmar (2005), Ward (2005), Kudo and Simkin (2003), Otten (2000) and Smart et al. (2000).”
- Students’ attitudes towards culturally mixed groups on international campuses: impact of participation in diverse and non‐diverse groups (2008, background): “…and culturally diverse teams are becoming increasingly prevalent (Ledwith and Seymour 2001), and to foster more positive human relations in a socially interconnected world (Asmar 2005; Knight 1994), equipping students to function effectively in different cultural contexts is of critical importance.”