Students’ attitudes towards culturally mixed groups on international campuses: impact of participation in diverse and non‐diverse groups

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cultural distance, mindfulness and passive xenophobia: using Integrated Threat Theory to explore home higher education students’ perspectives on ‘internationalisation at home’ (2009, background): “A number of authors (e.g. Pritchard & Skinner, 2002; Aberson & Haag, 2007; Summers & Volet, 2008) have noted that increased intercultural contact can actually increase anxiety and/or decrease confidence in the short-term while new understanding and identities are constructed, especially where…”
Understanding friendship and learning networks of international and host students using longitudinal Social Network Analysis (2014, methodology): “…create and maintain social ties and learn from one another in a host culture has been a focal point of enquiry in both general adjustment and educational literature in the last thirty years (Gu et al., 2009; Russell et al., 2010; Summers & Volet, 2008; Volet & Jones, 2012; Ward et al., 2001).”
Investigating the impact of personality and early life experiences on intercultural interaction in internationalised universities (2012, background): “Also in Australia, Summers and Volet (2008) found that international students were more positive than home students about mixed group working, but that those home students with a mixed cultural heritage were more positive than their peers.”