The National Effective Teaching Institute: Assessment of Impact and Implications for Faculty Development

By Richard M. Felder, Rebecca Brent. 2010

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Architecture, Education, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9a33a57c1597ab6692f15a0eda9f5d827392075

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Architecture

1. Holly M. Matusovich

In Education

1. Lisa D. McNair
2. Natalie R. Nielsen
3. Susan Rundell Singer
4. Marie C. Paretti
5. Holly M. Matusovich
6. Cory Hixson
7. H. Schweingruber
8. Karl A. Smith

In Media Technology

1. Lisa D. McNair
2. Marie C. Paretti
3. Holly M. Matusovich
4. Cory Hixson

Citations in the corpus

• Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education (2012, background): “Participants in the NETI workshop reported that their experiences have moderately or substantially increased their use of the following practices: • learning objectives: 75%; • Bloom’s taxonomy: 55%; • active learning: 74%; • cooperative learning: 65%; • problem-based learning: 55%; • inquiry-based ”
• Faculty Motivation: A Gateway to Transforming Engineering Education (2014, background): “Within engineering, for example, the National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI) has positively fostered faculty adoption of new teaching practices (Felder & Brent, 2010).”
• Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. (2012, background): “In a survey of National Effective Teaching Institute in Engineering Education alumni who participated between 1993 and 2006, participants credited the workshop with raising their awareness and use of various learner-centered strategies (Felder and Brent, 2010).”