Validation of emotional intelligence scale in Chinese university students

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Perceived organizational politics, emotional intelligence and work outcomes: Empirical exploration of direct and indirect effects (2014, methodology): “…definition of EI (Mayer and Salovey, 1997); it has proven to be a reliable and valid scale (Law et al., 2004, 2008); and it has been utilized as an established measure in different cultures and different ethnic and gender groups (Law et al., 2004; Shi and Wang, 2007; Whitman et al., 2011).”
Emotional intelligence and life satisfaction in Chinese university students: The mediating role of self-esteem and social support (2012, methodology): “The WLEIS has good reliability and validity (e.g., Kong et al., 2012; Shi & Wang, 2007).”
EI training and pre-service teacher wellbeing (2014, background): “Alpha coefficients for total score have been reported to be .86 overall with .86 for males and .87 for females (Shi & Wang, 2007).”
Affectivity, Emotional Labor, Emotional Exhaustion, and Emotional Intelligence in Coaching (2016, methodology): “We chose this scale because (a) it used Mayer and Salovey’s definition of emotional intelligence reflecting its conceptualization, (b) it is shorter, and (c) there is good evidence of its reliability and validity (e.g., Shi & Wang, 2007; Wong & Law, 2002).”